Towards a regime-based typology of market evolution

This paper provides a typology for the analysis of markets in which new innovations have the potential to cause regime transition. We elaborate the typology of transition pathways (Geels and Schot, 2007) into a typology of market evolution, with transition being one of the possible types. We strengthen the theoretic link between transition and industrial innovation studies by moving beyond the incremental-radical innovation dichotomy, adopted in many industrial innovation studies, as well as map out the socio-technical dimension of market evolution. We test the Regime Evolution Framework (REF), as we call it, against the introduction of steam power in trains and ships, which are well-established cases. By doing so, we are better prepared to adopt the framework for the analysis of electric propulsion systems in cars, a potentially disruptive innovation that has slowly been entering mainstream markets. The framework allows us to: (i) better qualify the categories of sustaining and disruptive innovation; (ii) understand the evolution of hybrid patterns of market innovation, since the elements of emerging disruptive innovations sometimes sustain the established technology, and; (iii) assess and map emerging market patterns.

[1]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[2]  R. Kemp Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability , 1994 .

[3]  Marc Dijk,et al.  Technological frames of car engines , 2011 .

[4]  Rod Coombs,et al.  `Knowledge management practices' and path-dependency in innovation , 1998 .

[5]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[6]  Philip Bagwell The Transport Revolution 1770-1985 , 1988 .

[7]  Reid R. Heffner,et al.  Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[8]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[9]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[10]  C. Birchenhall,et al.  Is product life cycle theory a special case? Dominant designs and the emergence of market niches through coevolutionary-learning , 1998 .

[11]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  Combining choice modelling and multi-criteria analysis for technology diffusion: An application to the uptake of electric vehicles , 2012 .

[12]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[13]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  Who Will More Likely Buy PHEV: A Detailed Market Segmentation Analysis , 2010 .

[14]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[15]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[16]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Towards the Intelligent Grid: A Review of the Literature , 2008 .

[17]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[18]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[19]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: Innovation path creation through co- evolution of supply and demand , 2010 .

[20]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[21]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[22]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[23]  Anique Hommels,et al.  Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change , 2005 .

[24]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[25]  F. Geels Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[26]  Thomas Durand,et al.  Dual technological trees: Assessing the intensity and strategic significance of technological change , 1992 .

[27]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[28]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[29]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2010 .

[30]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Reinventing Your Business Model , 2008 .

[31]  Ian McNEIL,et al.  An Encyclopedia of the History of Technology , 2002 .

[32]  Matthew S. Olson,et al.  Cuando el crecimiento se estanca , 2008 .

[33]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  Automobility in transition?: A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport , 2012 .

[34]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[35]  Max E. Fletcher,et al.  The Suez Canal and World Shipping, 1869-1914 , 1958, The Journal of Economic History.

[36]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .