A comparison of the seismic performance of precast wall construction : emulation and hybrid approaches
暂无分享,去创建一个
Two geometrically identical half-scale precast concrete wall units were constructed and tested under reversed cyclic lateral loading. One unit was conventionally reinforced designed in accordance with NZS 3101: 1995 for full ductile response. The wall panel in this unit was grouted within a slot connection cast into the foundation beam. The other unit was part of a hybrid system that incorporated post-tensioned unbonded carbon fibre tendons and steel fibre reinforced concrete. Hysteretic energy dissipation devices were introduced by incorporating low yield strength tapered longitudinal reinforcement, acting as a fuse connection between the wall panel and the foundation beam. The geometry chosen for the walls was representative of a prototype four-storey building. Comparisons between the hybrid wall system and a precast conventionally reinforced specimen are made. Benefits of the hybrid structural system are highlighted in comparison with conventional monolithic construction.
[1] Jiahao Lin,et al. An Introduction to Seismic Isolation , 1993 .
[2] D. Mitchell,et al. Prestressed concrete structures , 1991 .
[3] Sri Sritharan,et al. Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test Building , 1999 .