The irrelevant information principle for collective probabilistic reasoning

Within the framework of discrete probabilistic uncertain reasoning a large literature exists justifying the maximum entropy inference process, ME, as being optimal in the context of a single agent whose subjective probabilistic knowledge base is consistent. In particular Paris and Vencovska completely characterised the ME inference process by means of an attractive set of axioms which an inference process should satisfy. More recently the second author extended the Paris-Vencovska axiomatic approach to inference processes in the context of several agents whose subjective probabilistic knowledge bases, while individually consistent, may be collectively inconsistent. In particular he defined a natural multi--agent extension of the inference process ME called the social entropy process, SEP. However, while SEP has been shown to possess many attractive properties, those which are known are almost certainly insufficient to uniquely characterise it. It is therefore of particular interest to study those Paris-Vencovska principles valid for ME whose immediate generalisations to the multi-agent case are not satisfied by SEP. One of these principles is the Irrelevant Information Principle, a powerful and appealing principle which very few inference processes satisfy even in the single agent context. In this paper we will investigate whether SEP can satisfy an interesting modified generalisation of this principle.

[1]  Jiri Vomlel Methods Of Probabilistic Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[2]  José M. Bernardo,et al.  Bayesian Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[3]  E. T. Jaynes,et al.  Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy , 1979 .

[4]  Rodney W. Johnson,et al.  Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum cross-entropy , 1980, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  R. Jackson Inequalities , 2007, Algebra for Parents.

[6]  C. Genest,et al.  Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis , 1987 .

[7]  Jan Krac,et al.  Cooperation Methods in Bayesian Decision Making with Multiple Participants , 2009 .

[8]  R. Carnap On the Application of Inductive Logic , 1947 .

[9]  Peter Hawes,et al.  Investigation of Properties of Some Inference Processes , 2007 .

[10]  G. Wilmers Generalising the Maximum Entropy Inference Process to the Aggregation of Probabilistic Beliefs Version 5 , 2011 .

[11]  Hartley Slater J. B. Paris, the Uncertain Reasoner's Companion , 1997 .

[13]  Jeff B. Paris,et al.  A note on the inevitability of maximum entropy , 1990, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[14]  George Wilmers,et al.  The Social Entropy Process: Axiomatising theAggregation of Probabilistic Beliefs , 2010 .

[15]  George Wilmers,et al.  Probabilistic Merging Operators , 2014 .

[16]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Aggregating Probabilistic Forecasts from Incoherent and Abstaining Experts , 2008, Decis. Anal..

[17]  Jeff B. Paris,et al.  On the applicability of maximum entropy to inexact reasoning , 1989, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[18]  Gabriele Kern-Isberner,et al.  Belief revision and information fusion on optimum entropy , 2004, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[19]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Aggregating disparate estimates of chance , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..