Abstract Chronic pain patients reported pain intensity on each of 3 pain intensity scales, the visual analog, numerical and adjectival scales, and then ranked the scales in order of perceived best communication of pain intensity. All patients were able to complete an adjectival scale but 11% were unable to complete a visual analog scale and 2% failed at a numeric scale. The intensity of the pain ratings on the 3 scales were significantly correlated and there were no reliable differences in reported intensity as a function of preference. Pain intensity was reliably higher on each scale for depressed‐anxious patients as compared to non‐depressed/non‐anxious patients. Patients completing all 3 scales indicated a significant preference for the adjectival scale but the basis for this preference did not appear related to sex, etiology of pain, affective variables nor selected psychological variables. These data indicate that pain scale preference does not influence pain intensity report. Nevertheless, there are some clinical situations in which a numeric scale is likely to yield a better measure of pain intensity.
[1]
Relationship of significance of wound to pain experienced.
,
1956,
Journal of the American Medical Association.
[2]
G. Duncan,et al.
The pain profile: a computerized system for assessment of chronic pain
,
1978,
Pain.
[3]
B. Tursky,et al.
ETHNIC DIFFERENCES AMONG HOUSEWIVES IN PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND SKIN POTENTIAL RESPONSES TO ELECTRIC SHOCK.
,
1965,
Psychophysiology.
[4]
E. Ohnhaus,et al.
Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale
,
1975,
PAIN.
[5]
M Rosen,et al.
The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain
,
1976,
Anaesthesia.
[6]
H. Beecher.
Relationship of significance of wound to pain experienced.
,
1956,
Journal of the American Medical Association.
[7]
R. Melzack.
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
,
1975,
PAIN.