Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials

Abstract Objective To assess the effects of selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX 2) inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the risk of vascular events. Design Meta-analysis of published and unpublished tabular data from randomised trials, with indirect estimation of the effects of traditional NSAIDs. Data sources Medline and Embase (January 1966 to April 2005); Food and Drug Administration records; and data on file from Novartis, Pfizer, and Merck. Review methods Eligible studies were randomised trials that included a comparison of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus placebo or a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus a traditional NSAID, of at least four weeks' duration, with information on serious vascular events (defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death). Individual investigators and manufacturers provided information on the number of patients randomised, numbers of vascular events, and the person time of follow-up for each randomised group. Results In placebo comparisons, allocation to a selective COX 2 inhibitor was associated with a 42% relative increase in the incidence of serious vascular events (1.2%/year v 0.9%/year; rate ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.78; P = 0.003), with no significant heterogeneity among the different selective COX 2 inhibitors. This was chiefly attributable to an increased risk of myocardial infarction (0.6%/year v 0.3%/year; 1.86, 1.33 to 2.59; P = 0.0003), with little apparent difference in other vascular outcomes. Among trials of at least one year's duration (mean 2.7 years), the rate ratio for vascular events was 1.45 (1.12 to 1.89; P = 0.005). Overall, the incidence of serious vascular events was similar between a selective COX 2 inhibitor and any traditional NSAID (1.0%/year v 0.9%/year; 1.16, 0.97 to 1.38; P = 0.1). However, statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.001) was found between trials of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus naproxen (1.57, 1.21 to 2.03) and of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus non-naproxen NSAIDs (0.88, 0.69 to 1.12). The summary rate ratio for vascular events, compared with placebo, was 0.92 (0.67 to 1.26) for naproxen, 1.51 (0.96 to 2.37) for ibuprofen, and 1.63 (1.12 to 2.37) for diclofenac. Conclusions Selective COX 2 inhibitors are associated with a moderate increase in the risk of vascular events, as are high dose regimens of ibuprofen and diclofenac, but high dose naproxen is not associated with such an excess.

[1]  M. Brochier Evaluation of flurbiprofen for prevention of reinfarction and reocclusion after successful thrombolysis or angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. The Flurbiprofen French Trial. , 1993, European heart journal.

[2]  M. Lavezzari,et al.  Indobufen in the Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications in Patients With Heart Disease A Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Double‐Blind Study , 1993, Circulation.

[3]  Walker,et al.  Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients , 1994 .

[4]  R Day,et al.  Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  S A Rich,et al.  The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Karen A Robinson,et al.  Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  C. Patrono,et al.  Selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, aspirin, and cardiovascular disease: a reappraisal. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  P. Duke,et al.  Efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  T. Schnitzer,et al.  Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), reduction in ulcer complications: randomised controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[10]  C. Lines,et al.  Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Marc A Pfeffer,et al.  Cardiovascular Risk Associated With Celecoxib in a Clinical Trial for Colorectal Adenoma Prevention , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Colin Baigent,et al.  Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of atherothrombosis. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  B. Psaty,et al.  Parecoxib, valdecoxib, and cardiovascular risk. , 2005, Circulation.

[14]  Andreas Hoeft,et al.  Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Review: selective COX 2 inhibitors increase vascular events more than placebo and naproxen but not more than other NSAIDs , 2006, Evidence-based medicine.