A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA

PurposeThis paper aims at spelling out the area of protection (AoP), namely the general concept of human well-being and the impact categories in social life cycle assessment (SLCA). The applicability of the so-called capabilities approach—a concept frequently used for evaluating human lives—is explored. It is shown how the principles of the capabilities approach can be transferred to the impact assessment within SLCA.MethodsThe literature concerning the AoP and the impact assessment has been critically reviewed from an applied philosophy perspective. The capabilities approach has been adopted for defining both the AoP and the impact categories.ResultsThe main results are the following: (1) The AoP is defined as autonomy, well-being freedom and fairness; (2) using the dimensions which constitute well-being together with the concept of fairness eight impact categories are proposed: life, knowledge and aesthetic experience, work and play, friendship, self-integration, self-expression, transcendence and fairness itself and (3) by examining the ‘Guide to Social LCA: Methodological Sheets’, it is demonstrated that our proposed framework can be used for structuring the previous work on impact assessment.ConclusionsThe capability approach is one possibility for addressing the question ‘what is of importance in a human life?’ When applied in a practical field, like SLCA, this framework is not only useful for structuring data but also for disclosing our own normative assumptions about what counts as valuable in a human life. Thus, the normative evaluation is more coherent.

[1]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! , 2010 .

[2]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[3]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment , 2009 .

[4]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[5]  Sabina Alkire,et al.  Dimensions of Human Development , 2002 .

[6]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life-Cycle based methods for sustainable product development , 2003 .

[7]  M. Hauschild,et al.  A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (10 pp) , 2006 .

[8]  B. D. Vries,et al.  Conceptualizing sustainable development An assessment methodology connecting values, knowledge, worldviews and scenarios , 2009 .

[9]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[10]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2006 .

[11]  John Finnis,et al.  Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends , 1987 .

[12]  Des Gasper Needs and Well-being , 2009 .

[13]  A. Sen,et al.  The idea of justice , 2009, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[14]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  SETAC-Europe: Second working group on LCIA (WIA-2): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment: Background document for the second working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2) , 1999 .

[15]  Sophie Spillemaeckers,et al.  From Individual Well-Being to Sustainable Development. A Path Where Psychologists and Economists Meet , 2010 .

[16]  Luc Van Ootegem A capabilities approach on well-being and sustainable development , 2009 .

[17]  Breena Holland,et al.  Justice and the Environment in Nussbaum's “Capabilities Approach” , 2008 .

[18]  Fridolin S. Brand,et al.  Building a "theory of sustainable development" : two salient conceptions within the German discourse , 2008 .

[19]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Sustainable Development : Capabilities, Needs, and Well-being , 2011 .

[20]  Konrad Ott,et al.  Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit , 2008 .

[21]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Methodologies for social life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[22]  Flavio Comim,et al.  Choosing sustainable consumption: a capability perspective on indicators , 2007 .

[23]  Amartya Sen Human Rights and Capabilities , 2005 .

[24]  S. Alkire Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction , 2002 .