Volatility forecasting using high frequency data: Evidence from stock markets

The paper aims to suggest the best volatility forecasting model for stock markets in Turkey. The findings of this paper support the superiority of high frequency based volatility forecasting models over traditional GARCH models. MIDAS and HAR-RV-CJ models are found to be the best among high frequency based volatility forecasting models. Moreover, MIDAS model performs better in crisis period. The findings of paper are important for financial institutions, investors and policy makers.

[1]  David I. Harvey The evaluation of economic forecasts , 1997 .

[2]  E. Ghysels,et al.  MIDAS Regressions: Further Results and New Directions , 2006 .

[3]  Mardi Dungey The Tsunami: Measures of Contagion in the 2007–2008 Credit Crunch , 2008 .

[4]  Francis X. Diebold,et al.  Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility , 2001 .

[5]  Jock R. Anderson,et al.  Rural Extension Services , 2003 .

[6]  P. Hansen,et al.  Realized GARCH: A Joint Model of Returns and Realized Measures of Volatility , 2010 .

[7]  Eric Ghysels,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series the Midas Touch: Mixed Data Sampling Regression Models the Midas Touch: Mixed Data Sampling Regression Models* , 2022 .

[8]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Intradaily periodicity and volatility spillovers between international stock index futures markets , 2005 .

[9]  Fulvio Corsi,et al.  A Simple Long Memory Model of Realized Volatility , 2004 .

[10]  R. Gencay,et al.  An Introduc-tion to High-Frequency Finance , 2001 .

[11]  R. Engle,et al.  A Multiple Indicators Model for Volatility Using Intra-Daily Data , 2003 .

[12]  E. Ghysels,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series Predicting Volatility: Getting the Most out of Return Data Sampled at Different Frequencies , 2022 .

[13]  N. Shephard,et al.  Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps , 2003 .

[14]  Hans R. Stoll,et al.  The Dynamics of Stock Index and Stock Index Futures Returns , 1990, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[15]  F. Diebold,et al.  The distribution of realized stock return volatility , 2001 .

[16]  A. Gallant,et al.  Alternative models for stock price dynamics , 2003 .

[17]  Christian T. Brownlees,et al.  Financial Econometric Analysis at Ultra-High Frequency: Data Handling Concerns , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[18]  Tim Bollerslev,et al.  Some Like it Smooth, and Some Like it Rough: Untangling Continuous and Jump Components in Measuring, Modeling, and Forecasting Asset Return Volatility , 2003 .

[19]  E. Ghysels,et al.  There is a Risk-Return Tradeoff after All , 2004 .

[20]  Tim Bollerslev,et al.  Roughing it Up: Including Jump Components in the Measurement, Modeling and Forecasting of Return Volatility , 2007 .

[21]  Luca Benzoni,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Continuous-Time Equity Return Models , 2001 .

[22]  P. Hansen,et al.  Realized Variance and Market Microstructure Noise , 2005 .

[23]  Neil Shephard,et al.  Realising the future: forecasting with high frequency based volatility (HEAVY) models , 2010 .

[24]  Burak Saltoǧlu,et al.  MIDAS Volatility Forecast Performance Under Market Stress: Evidence from Emerging and Developed Stock Markets , 2009 .

[25]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  ANSWERING THE SKEPTICS: YES, STANDARD VOLATILITY MODELS DO PROVIDE ACCURATE FORECASTS* , 1998 .