Geomechanics Coupling Simulation of Fracture Closure and Its Influence on Gas Production in Shale Gas Reservoirs

A sharp initial decline in the production rate is being experienced in many shale gas plays. One reason is the closure of natural micron and micro fractures. The natural fractures, which widely exist in the over-pressurized source rock, react sensitively to the change of subsurface stress. The change in stress can be caused by the decrease of gas pressure during production. These fracture closure or re-open phenomena have significant effects on reservoir permeability and gas production. In this paper, a fully coupled geomechanics and multiphase fluid flow model is presented to accurately simulate the fields of stress and fluid flow in shale gas reservoirs. Several relationships between fracture closure and applied stress are incorporated in this model, based on the experimental data from literatures. Therefore, the stress dependency of shale natural fractures is quantified and modeled in its full complexity. The natural fractures in this model are characterized as stiff, self-propped, and prone to closure. It represents an extension of our earlier “hybrid-fracture model” (DFN for hydraulic fractures, doubleporosity for natural fractured domain inside the SRV, and single porosity or dual-continuum outside the SRV).

[1]  William Standifird,et al.  Stress-Dependent Fluid Flow and Permeability in Fractured Media: from Lab Experiments to Engineering Applications , 2007 .

[2]  Yu-Shu Wu,et al.  Modeling Analysis of Transient Pressure and Flow Behavior at Horizontal Wells with Multi-Stage Hydraulic Fractures in Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2014 .

[3]  Daniel J. Soeder,et al.  Porosity and Permeability of Eastern Devonian Gas Shale , 1988 .

[4]  Fred P. Wang,et al.  Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales , 2009 .

[5]  Alireza Baghbanan,et al.  Stress effects on permeability in a fractured rock mass with correlated fracture length and aperture , 2008 .

[6]  Antonin Settari,et al.  Advances in Coupled Geomechanical and Reservoir Modeling With Applications to Reservoir Compaction , 2001 .

[7]  Yu-Shu Wu,et al.  A Unified Mathematical Model for Unconventional Reservoir Simulation , 2011 .

[8]  D. K. Davies,et al.  Stress-dependent permeability: Characterization and modeling , 2001 .

[9]  Yu-Shu Wu,et al.  A Generalized Framework Model for the Simulation of Gas Production in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs , 2014 .

[10]  Gudmundur S. Bodvarsson,et al.  A modeling approach for analysis of coupled multiphase fluid flow, heat transfer, and deformation in fractured porous rock , 2002 .

[11]  F. Meissner Petroleum Geology of the Bakken Formation Williston Basin, North Dakota and Montana , 1991 .

[12]  Amanda M. M. Bustin,et al.  Impact of Shale Properties on Pore Structure and Storage Characteristics , 2008 .

[13]  Didier Yu Ding,et al.  Characterizing Hydraulic Fractures in Shale Gas Reservoirs Using Transient Pressure Tests , 2013 .

[14]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  The Relationship Between Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture-Treatment Design , 2010 .

[15]  Yu-Shu Wu,et al.  Coupled Geomechanical and Reactive Geochemical Model for Fluid and Heat Flow: Application for Enhanced Geothermal Reservoir , 2013, All Days.

[16]  Marte Gutierrez,et al.  Stress-dependent permeability of a de-mineralised fracture in shale , 2000 .