Higher mutation rate helps to rescue genes from the elimination by selection.

Directional mutation pressure associated with replication processes is the main cause of the asymmetry between the leading and lagging DNA strands in bacterial genomes. On the other hand, the asymmetry between sense and antisense strands of protein coding sequences is a result of both mutation and selection pressures. Thus, there are two different ways of superposition of the sense strand, on the leading or lagging strand. Besides many other implications of these two possible situations, one seems to be very important - because of the asymmetric replication-associated mutation pressure, the mutation rate of genes depends on their location. Using Monte Carlo methods, we have simulated, under experimentally determined directional mutation pressure, the divergence rate and the elimination rate of genes depending on their location in respect to the leading/lagging DNA strands in the asymmetric prokaryotic genome. We have found that the best survival strategy for the majority of genes is to sometimes switch between DNA strands. Paradoxically, this strategy results in higher substitution rates but remains in agreement with observations in bacterial genomes that such inversions are very frequent and divergence rate between homologs lying on different DNA strands is very high.

[1]  G. Paul,et al.  Molecular Diversity and Evolution of blaTEM Genes Encoding β-Lactamases Resistant to Clavulanic Acid in Clinical E. coli , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[2]  Temple F. Smith,et al.  Patterns of Genome Organization in Bacteria , 1998, Science.

[3]  S. Cebrat,et al.  High divergence rate of sequences located on different DNA strands in closely related bacterial genomes. , 2003, Journal of applied genetics.

[4]  A. Danchin,et al.  Universal replication biases in bacteria , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[5]  J O McInerney,et al.  Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  S. Karlin,et al.  Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature. , 1995, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[7]  Kui Lin,et al.  Strand Compositional Asymmetries of Nuclear DNA in Eukaryotes , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[8]  R D Appel,et al.  A new generation of information retrieval tools for biologists: the example of the ExPASy WWW server. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[9]  J. Lobry Asymmetric substitution patterns in the two DNA strands of bacteria. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  H. Ochman,et al.  Strand asymmetries in DNA evolution. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  Paweł Mackiewicz,et al.  Mechanisms generating long-range correlation in nucleotide composition of the Borrelia burgdorferi genome , 1999 .

[13]  S. Cebrat,et al.  Asymmetry of nucleotide composition of prokaryotic chromosomes , 1999 .

[14]  T. Tanaka,et al.  Recent Progress in Self-Healable Hydrogel-Based Electroluminescent Devices: A Comprehensive Review , 2023, Gels.

[15]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Base Composition Skews, Replication Orientation, and Gene Orientation in 12 Prokaryote Genomes , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[16]  Jerry L. Slightom,et al.  Base substitutions, length differences and DNA strand asymmetries in the human G γ and A γ fetal globin gene region , 1981, Cell.

[17]  M. Wilkins,et al.  Cross-species protein identification using amino acid composition, peptide mass fingerprinting, isoelectric point and molecular mass: a theoretical evaluation. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Joël-Paul Grillasca,et al.  SPAC: Identification of Polypeptides using Their Amino-acid Composition , 2000, Comput. Chem..

[19]  U. Hobohm,et al.  A sequence property approach to searching protein databases. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  From Proteins to Proteomes: Large Scale Protein Identification by Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Arnino Acid Analysis , 1996, Bio/Technology.

[21]  E. Tillier,et al.  Replication Orientation Affects the Rate and Direction of Bacterial Gene Evolution , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[22]  E V Koonin,et al.  Gene order is not conserved in bacterial evolution. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  A Bairoch,et al.  Multiple parameter cross‐species protein identification using MultiIdent ‐ a world‐wide web accessible tool , 1998, Electrophoresis.

[24]  S. Cebrat,et al.  Evolution Rates of Genes on Leading and Lagging DNA Strands , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  J. C. Shepherd Method to determine the reading frame of a protein from the purine/pyrimidine genome sequence and its possible evolutionary justification. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  S. Karlin,et al.  Strand compositional asymmetry in bacterial and large viral genomes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J. Lawrence The Dynamic Bacterial Genome , 2005 .

[28]  A Grigoriev,et al.  Analyzing genomes with cumulative skew diagrams. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  S. Cebrat,et al.  Asymmetry of coding versus noncoding strand in coding sequences of different genomes. , 1997, Microbial & comparative genomics.

[30]  A. Galat,et al.  Convergence of amino acid compositions of certain groups of proteins aids in their identification on two‐dimensional electrophoresis gels , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[31]  S. Cebrat,et al.  DNA asymmetry and the replicational mutational pressure. , 2001, Journal of applied genetics.

[32]  Paweł Mackiewicz,et al.  Rearrangements between differently replicating DNA strands in asymmetric bacterial genomes. , 2003, Acta microbiologica Polonica.

[33]  C Sander,et al.  Amino acid analysis and protein database compositional search as a rapid and inexpensive method to identify proteins. , 1994, Analytical biochemistry.

[34]  A. Danchin,et al.  Ongoing evolution of strand composition in bacterial genomes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  R. Cedergren,et al.  Natural selection versus primitive gene structure as determinant of codon usage. , 1986, European journal of biochemistry.

[36]  T. Gojobori,et al.  Dynamic Evolution of Genomes and the Concept of Genome Space , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  P. Argos,et al.  Identification of proteins in sequence databases from amino acid composition data. , 1991, Analytical biochemistry.

[38]  S. Cebrat,et al.  How does replication-associated mutational pressure influence amino acid composition of proteins? , 1999, Genome research.

[39]  S. Cebrat,et al.  Is there replication-associated mutational pressure in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome? , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  N. Sueoka,et al.  Asymmetric directional mutation pressures in bacteria , 2002, Genome Biology.

[41]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi , 1997, Nature.

[42]  Diarmaid Hughes,et al.  Evaluating genome dynamics: the constraints on rearrangements within bacterial genomes , 2000, Genome Biology.

[43]  A. Kolstø,et al.  Dynamic bacterial genome organization , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[44]  P. Sharp,et al.  Proteome composition and codon usage in spirochaetes: species-specific and DNA strand-specific mutational biases. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  E. Tillier,et al.  The Contributions of Replication Orientation, Gene Direction, and Signal Sequences to Base-Composition Asymmetries in Bacterial Genomes , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[46]  J. Lobry,et al.  Asymmetric substitution patterns: a review of possible underlying mutational or selective mechanisms. , 1999, Gene.

[47]  Maria Kowalczuk,et al.  High correlation between the turnover of nucleotides under mutational pressure and the DNA composition , 2001, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[48]  M R Wilkins,et al.  Cross‐species identification of proteins separated by two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis using matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionisation/time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry and amino acid composition , 1995, Electrophoresis.

[49]  H. Mori,et al.  Evolutionary instability of operon structures disclosed by sequence comparisons of complete microbial genomes. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.