Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance.

Choking under pressure is defined as performance decrements under circumstances that increase the importance of good or improved performance. A model for choking on coordination and skill tasks is proposed, holding that the pressure increases the conscious attention to the performer's own process of performance and that this increased conscious attention disrupts the automatic or overlearned nature of the execution. Six experiments provided data consistent with this model. Three studies showed that increased attention to one's own process of performance resulted in performance decrements. Three other studies showed similar decrements produced by situational manipulations of pressure (i.e., implicit competition, a cash incentive, and audience-induced pressure). Individuals low in dispositional self-consciousness were shown to be more susceptible to choking under pressure than those high in it.

[1]  S. Duval,et al.  A theory of objective self awareness , 1972 .

[2]  Michele K. Steigleder.  Drivelike motivational properties of competitive behavior. , 1980 .

[3]  D. Wegner,et al.  Arousal-induced attention to self , 1980 .

[4]  E. Aronson,et al.  Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[5]  E. Langer,et al.  When practice makes imperfect: debilitating effects of overlearning. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Rainer Martens,et al.  Evaluation potential as a determinant of coaction effects , 1972 .

[7]  E. Langer,et al.  Crowding and cognitive control. , 1977 .

[8]  J. Sartre,et al.  Being and Nothingness , 2022 .

[9]  J. J. Seta,et al.  The impact of comparison processes on coactors' task performance. , 1982 .

[10]  M. Scheier,et al.  Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. , 1975 .

[11]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Inferior performance as a selective response to expectancy: Taking a dive to make a point , 1979 .

[12]  R. Feinberg,et al.  Motivating and reinforcing functions of competitive behavior. , 1978 .

[13]  J. Wine.  Test anxiety and direction of attention. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Pygmalion and galatea: The interactive effect of teacher and student expectancies , 1975 .

[15]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Test anxiety, stress, and social support , 1981 .

[16]  William C. House,et al.  Valence of expected and unexpected outcomes as a function of locus of goal and type of expectancy. , 1974 .

[17]  L. Wankel.  Competition in Motor Performance: An Experimental Analysis of Motivational Components. , 1972 .

[18]  P. Paulus,et al.  The effect of spectator presence on gymnastic performance in a field situation , 1972 .

[19]  S. Bem.  The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[20]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Competition of internal and external information in an exercise setting. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  P. Paulus,et al.  An analysis of gymnastic performance under conditions of practice and spectator observation. , 1974, Research quarterly.

[22]  R. Baumeister.  A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[23]  G. Kimble,et al.  The problem of volition. , 1970, Psychological review.

[24]  C. Carver,et al.  Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. , 1978 .

[25]  R F HEFFERLINE,et al.  Escape and Avoidance Conditioning in Human Subjects without Their Observation of the Response , 1959, Science.