Energy-Efficient Duty Cycle Assignment for Receiver-Based Convergecast in Wireless Sensor Networks

Duty cycling is often used to reduce the energy consumption caused by idle listening in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Most studies on WSN protocols define a common duty cycle value throughout the network to achieve synchronization among the nodes. On the other hand, a few studies propose adaptation of the duty cycle according to uniform traffic conditions, which is beneficial assuming one-to-one traffic patterns that result in evenly distributed packet traffic. In this work, we consider the convergecast communication pattern commonly observed in WSNs. In convergecast communication, the packet traffic observed around the sink node is much higher than the traffic observed far from the sink, i.e., nodes with different distances to the sink node receive and must relay different amounts of traffic. Additionally, we utilize receiver-based protocols, which enable nodes to communicate with no synchronization or neighbor information, and hence do not require all nodes in the network to have the same duty cycle. In this paper, we model the expected energy consumption of nodes utilizing receiver-based protocols as a function of their duty cycle and their distance to the sink node. Using this analysis, we derive a closed-form formula for the duty cycle that minimizes the expected energy consumption at a given distance. Moreover, we propose an adaptation method for the derived distance-based duty cycle, based on local observed traffic. Performance evaluations of the two proposed duty cycle assignment methods show that they greatly improve the energy efficiency without sacrificing packet delivery ratio or delay significantly.

[1]  Muralidhar Medidi,et al.  Extending Lifetime with Differential Duty Cycles in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[2]  Sridhar Radhakrishnan,et al.  PMAC: an adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2005, 19th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium.

[3]  Lili Qiu,et al.  SOAR: Simple Opportunistic Adaptive Routing Protocol for Wireless Mesh Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Hakan Deliç,et al.  The impact of a realistic packet traffic model on the performance of surveillance wireless sensor networks , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[5]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Energy and Latency Performance , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[6]  Cristina V. Lopes,et al.  Adaptive Low Power Listening for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[7]  Sang Hyuk Son,et al.  IGF: A State-Free Robust Communication Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2003 .

[8]  I.F. Akyildiz,et al.  A Cross-Layer Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[9]  Wendi B. Heinzelman,et al.  Duty Cycle Control for Low-Power-Listening MAC Protocols , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[10]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Multihop Performance , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..