PICC versus midlines: Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters with respect to incidence of thromboembolic and infectious complications.

[1]  Jong-Hyeon Jeong,et al.  Safety and utilization of peripherally inserted central catheters versus midline catheters at a large academic medical center. , 2016, American journal of infection control.

[2]  A. Little,et al.  The Midline Catheter: A Clinical Review. , 2016, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  V. Chopra,et al.  The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  M. Hill,et al.  How to Establish an Effective Midline Program: A Case Study of 2 Hospitals , 2015 .

[5]  R. Pathak,et al.  The Incidence of Central Line–Associated Bacteremia After the Introduction of Midline Catheters in a Ventilator Unit Population , 2015, Infectious diseases in clinical practice.

[6]  A. Esterman,et al.  The safety and efficacy of midlines compared to peripherally inserted central catheters for adult cystic fibrosis patients: a retrospective, observational study. , 2014, International journal of nursing studies.

[7]  L. Mazzolai,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of peripherally inserted central catheters vs. peripheral catheters for middle duration in‐hospital intravenous therapy , 2008, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[8]  L. Mermel,et al.  The Risk of Midline Catheterization in Hospitalized Patients: A Prospective Study , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Lucie M. Ramjan,et al.  The Use of Midline Catheters in the Adult Acute Care Setting - Clinical Implications and Recommendations for Practice , 2011 .