Does health differ between participants and non-participants in the MRI-HUNT study, a population based neuroimaging study? The Nord-Trøndelag health studies 1984–2009

BackgroundBias with regard to participation in epidemiological studies can have a large impact on the generalizability of results. Our aim was to investigate the direction and magnitude of potential bias by comparing health-related factors among participants and non-participants in a MRI-study based on HUNT, a large Norwegian health survey.MethodsOf 14,033 individuals aged 50–65, who had participated in all three large public health surveys within the Norwegian county of Nord-Trøndelag (HUNT 1, 2 and 3), 1,560 who lived within 45 minutes of travel from the city of Levanger were invited to a MRI study (MRI-HUNT). The sample of participants in MRI-HUNT (n = 1,006) were compared with those who were invited but did not participate (n = 554) and with those who were eligible but not invited (n = 12,473), using univariate analyses and logistic regression analyses adjusting for age and education level.ResultsSelf-reported health did not differ between the three groups, but participants had a higher education level and were somewhat younger than the two other groups. In the adjusted multivariate analyses, obesity was consistently less prevalent among participants. Significant differences in blood pressure and cholesterol were also found.ConclusionThis is the first large population-based study comparing participants and non-participants in an MRI study with regard to general health. The groups were not widely different, but participants had a higher level of education, and were less likely to be obese and have hypertension, and were slightly younger than non-participants. The observed differences between participants and non-invited individuals are probably partly explained by the inclusion criterion that participants had to live within 45 minutes of transport to where the MRI examination took place. One will expect that the participants have somewhat less brain morphological changes related to cardiovascular risk factors than the general population. Such consequences underline the crucial importance of evaluation of non-participants in MRI studies.

[1]  A. Toga,et al.  Brain Structure and Obesity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  K. Tambs,et al.  Alcohol use and mental distress as predictors of non-response in a general population health survey: the HUNT study , 2011, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[3]  Carol Brayne,et al.  Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation , 2004, BMC public health.

[4]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study , 2010, The Lancet.

[5]  Jelle Jolles,et al.  Multiple indicators of age-related differences in cerebral white matter and the modifying effects of hypertension , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Aad van der Lugt,et al.  Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cerebral Microbleeds: An Update of the Rotterdam Scan Study , 2010, Stroke.

[7]  E Auffray,et al.  Longitudinal study of blood pressure and white matter hyperintensities , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  Xue Hua,et al.  The effects of physical activity, education, and body mass index on the aging brain , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[9]  K. Midthjell,et al.  [A health survey in Nord-Trøndelag 1984-86. Participation and comparison of attendants and non-attendants]. , 1990, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[10]  R. Collins,et al.  Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies , 2009, The Lancet.

[11]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  Relationship of Hypertension, Blood Pressure, and Blood Pressure Control With White Matter Abnormalities in the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS)—MRI Trial , 2010, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[12]  S. Galea,et al.  Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. , 2007, Annals of epidemiology.

[13]  Arnulf Langhammer,et al.  The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 1995-97 (HUNT 2): Objectives, contents, methods and participation , 2003 .

[14]  M. Haapea,et al.  Non-participation may bias the results of a psychiatric survey , 2007, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[15]  E. Stice,et al.  Relation of regional gray and white matter volumes to current BMI and future increases in BMI: a prospective MRI study , 2012, International Journal of Obesity.

[16]  D. Bowen,et al.  Scientific Bias Arising from Sampling, Selective Recruitment, and Attrition: The Case for Improved Reporting , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[17]  C. Brayne,et al.  A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  P. Hartge,et al.  Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Karsten Mueller,et al.  Sex-Dependent Influences of Obesity on Cerebral White Matter Investigated by Diffusion-Tensor Imaging , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  F. Lampe,et al.  Non-attendance at re-examination 20 years after screening in the British Regional Heart Study. , 2002, Journal of public health medicine.