Convergence or National Specificity? Testing the CI Maturity Model Across Multiple Countries

This study empirically tests the Continuous Improvement (CI) maturity model across multiple countries. The analysis is based on data from the 2nd International CINet Survey, limited to the situation in Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Despite some differences in Continuous Improvement maturity level between countries, findings lend support to the convergence argument. Regardless of national specificity, Continuous Improvement behaviour patterns emerge in a similar fashion, and furthermore, correspond to improved operational performance if adopted. In addition, findings show that other contextual variables such as company size and type of production system are of limited importance. This implies that Continuous Improvement is something that can be implemented and developed successfully if managed properly, irrespective of contextual influences such as those stemming from cultural and industrial factors.

[1]  P. Dorfman,et al.  UNDERSTANDING CULTURES AND IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP THEORIES ACROSS THE GLOBE: AN INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT GLOBE , 2002 .

[2]  G. Hofstede Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? , 1980 .

[3]  Jacqueline K. Mitchelson,et al.  Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions , 2003 .

[4]  Ismail Sila,et al.  An investigation of the total quality management survey based research published between 1989 and 2000: A literature review , 2002 .

[5]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Quality management practices: a comparative study between East and West , 1998 .

[6]  Paul Hyland,et al.  Performance measurement and continuous improvement: are they linked to manufacturing strategy? , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[7]  Harry Boer,et al.  Ci Implementation: An Empirical Test of the Ci Maturity Model , 2006 .

[8]  Antonella Martini,et al.  Tools and abilities for continuous improvement: what are the drivers of performance? , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[9]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[10]  Scott F. Rockart,et al.  Overcoming the improvement paradox , 1999 .

[11]  J. Bessant,et al.  High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement , 1997 .

[12]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  TQM across multiple countries: Convergence hypothesis versus national specificity arguments , 2005 .

[13]  José Albors-Garrigos,et al.  CI practice in Spain: its role as a strategic tool for the firm. Empirical evidence from the CINet survey analysis , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[14]  John Bessant,et al.  Enabling continuous improvement: a case study of implementation , 2004 .

[15]  John Bessant,et al.  An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour , 2001 .

[16]  Kee-hung Lai,et al.  An operational and institutional perspective on total quality management , 2007 .

[17]  R. Johnston,et al.  Operations and Process Management: Principles and Practice for Strategic Impact , 2006 .

[18]  Sarah Jane Caffyn The scope for the application of continuous improvement to the process of new product development , 1998 .

[19]  John Bessant,et al.  What challenges lie ahead for improvement programmes in the UK? Lessons from the CINet Continuous Improvement Survey 2003 , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[20]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Nederlandse samenvatting en bewerking van 'Multivariate data analysis, 4th Edition, 1995' , 1998 .

[21]  Rick Middel,et al.  Continuous improvement in The Netherlands: a survey-based study into current practices , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[22]  Taina Savolainen,et al.  Cycles of continuous improvement , 1999 .

[23]  Harry Boer,et al.  CI changes: from suggestion box to organisational learning , 2000 .

[24]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[25]  Lars Bengtsson,et al.  Continuous improvement capability in the Swedish engineering industry , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[26]  Michael Beer,et al.  Why Total Quality Management Programs Do Not Persist: The Role of Management Quality and Implications for Leading a TQM Transformation , 2003, Decis. Sci..