The tension between traditional innovation strategies and openness: Lindt’s controlled open innovation approach

Abstract: In this chapter, an exploration is presented of the tension generated in companies following a very traditional approach to managing R&D and innovation (mostly based on internal resources, competences and activities) even when globalization and the rapid pace of innovation driven by market forces, leads them to involve external actors in their R&D processes. The problem this tension generates, namely balancing the need for openness with the strategic relevance of internal R&D activities and core capabilities, which the company wishes to remain internal and private, is one faced by leading chocolate manufacturer, Lindt. Evidence from this case study illustrates how even ‘closed’ companies can adopt a ‘controlled open approach’ to innovation so as to exploit its potential benefits without radically modifying their business model.

[1]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[2]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  CHAMPIONS OF CHANGE AND STRATEGIC SHIFTS: THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CHANGE ADVOCATES* , 1991 .

[3]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda , 2006 .

[4]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field , 2009 .

[5]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[6]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation , 2009 .

[7]  Magnus Lagnevik,et al.  The Dynamics of Innovation Clusters: A Study of the Food Industry , 2003 .

[8]  A. Salter,et al.  Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? , 2004 .

[9]  Marcus M. Keupp,et al.  Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation , 2009 .

[10]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  Luis M. Molina,et al.  Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity , 2011 .

[12]  C. Christopher Baughn,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical study in Vietnam , 2006 .

[13]  Muge Ozman,et al.  The Two Faces of Open Innovation: Network Externalities and Learning , 2008 .

[14]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field , 2009 .

[15]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  Soumodip Sarkar,et al.  Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry , 2008 .

[17]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[18]  J. Bellairs Open Innovation Gaining Momentum in the Food Industry , 2010 .

[19]  S. Omta,et al.  The dark side of open innovation : A survey of failed inter-company cooperation , 2008 .

[20]  Marian Garcia Martinez,et al.  INNOVATION IN THE SPANISH FOOD AND DRINK INDUSTRY , 2000 .

[21]  Future R&D Strategies in Food & Drinks: Evolution from Orthodox Approaches to Open Innovation , 2011 .

[22]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Drivers of Outsourced Innovation: An Exploratory Study* , 2007 .

[23]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[24]  Henry R. Hertzfeld,et al.  Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships , 2006 .

[25]  I Sam Saguy,et al.  Reinventing R&D in an open innovation ecosystem. , 2011, Journal of food science.

[26]  S. Omta,et al.  Innovation drivers and barriers in food processing , 2009 .

[27]  William Kingston,et al.  Innovation needs patents reform , 2001 .

[28]  Raffaella Manzini,et al.  Different Modes of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework and an Empirical Study , 2009 .

[29]  M. Bogers The Open Innovation Paradox: Knowledge Sharing and Protection in R&D Collaborations , 2010 .

[30]  Wolfgang Sofka,et al.  Knowledge protection strategies of multinational firms--A cross-country comparison , 2010 .