Sensitivity of the Power Spectra of Magnetization Fluctuations in Low Barrier Nanomagnets to Barrier Height Modulation and Defects.

Nanomagnets with small shape anisotropy energy barriers on the order of the thermal energy have unstable magnetization that fluctuates randomly in time. They have recently emerged as promising hardware platforms for stochastic computing and machine learning because the random magnetization states can be harnessed for probabilistic bits. Here, we have studied how the statistics of the magnetization fluctuations (e.g. the power spectral density) is affected by (i) moderate variations in the barrier height of the nanomagnet and (ii) the presence of structural defects, in order to assess how robust the computing platform is. We found that the power spectral density is relatively insensitive to moderate barrier height change and also relatively insensitive to the presence of small localized defects. However, extended (delocalized) defects, such as thickness variations over a significant fraction of the nanomagnet, affect the power spectral density very noticeably. As a result, small variations in the shape (causing small variations in the barrier height), or small localized defects, are relatively innocuous and tolerable, but significant variation of the nanomagnet thickness is not. Consequently, tight control over the nanomagnet thickness must be maintained for stochastic computing applications.

[1]  Punyashloka Debashis,et al.  Design of Stochastic Nanomagnets for Probabilistic Spin Logic , 2018, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[2]  S. Datta,et al.  Low-Barrier Nanomagnets as p-Bits for Spin Logic , 2016, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[3]  Xichun Luo,et al.  Promising Lithography Techniques for Next-Generation Logic Devices , 2018 .

[4]  Supriyo Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Low Energy Barrier Nanomagnet Design for Binary Stochastic Neurons: Design Challenges for Real Nanomagnets With Fabrication Defects , 2019, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[5]  Supriyo Bandyopadhyay,et al.  The effect of material defects on resonant spin wave modes in a nanomagnet , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[6]  F. García-Sánchez,et al.  The design and verification of MuMax3 , 2014, 1406.7635.

[7]  Supriyo Datta,et al.  p-Bits for Probabilistic Spin Logic , 2018, Applied Physics Reviews.

[8]  Supriyo Datta,et al.  Intrinsic optimization using stochastic nanomagnets , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Supriyo Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Energy dissipation and switching delay in stress-induced switching of multiferroic nanomagnets in the presence of thermal fluctuations , 2011, 1111.6129.

[10]  Supriyo Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Reliability of Magnetoelastic Switching of Nonideal Nanomagnets with Defects: A Case Study for the Viability of Straintronic Logic and Memory , 2019, Physical Review Applied.

[11]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Design of a Low-Voltage Analog-to-Digital Converter Using Voltage-Controlled Stochastic Switching of Low Barrier Nanomagnets , 2018, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[12]  Supriyo Datta,et al.  Low-Barrier Magnet Design for Efficient Hardware Binary Stochastic Neurons , 2019, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[13]  Jonathan Leliaert,et al.  The design and verification of MuMax 3 , 2014 .