Attention Modulation of Neural Tuning Through Peak and Base Rate

This study investigates the influence of attention modulation on neural tuning functions. It has been shown in experiments that attention modulation alters neural tuning curves. Attention has been considered at least to serve to resolve limiting capacities and to increase the sensitivity to attended stimulus, while the exact functions of attention are still under debate. Inspired by recent experimental results on attention modulation, we investigate the influence of changes in the height and base rate of the tuning curve on the encoding accuracy, using the Fisher information. Under an assumption of stimulus-conditional independence of neural responses, we derive explicit conditions that determine when the height and base rate should be increased or decreased to improve encoding accuracy. Notably, a decrease in the tuning height and base rate can improve the encoding accuracy in some cases. Our theoretical results can predict the effective size of attention modulation on the neural population with respect to encoding accuracy. We discuss how our method can be used quantitatively to evaluate different aspects of attention function.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[3]  Herman P. Snippe,et al.  Parameter Extraction from Population Codes: A Critical Assessment , 1996, Neural Computation.

[4]  G. Orban,et al.  How well do response changes of striate neurons signal differences in orientation: a study in the discriminating monkey , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Responses in area V4 depend on the spatial relationship between stimulus and attention. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on the Reliability of Individual Neurons in Monkey Visual Cortex , 1999, Neuron.

[7]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[8]  F. Crick.  Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  The Effect of Correlations on the Fisher Information of Population Codes , 1998, NIPS.

[11]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[14]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[15]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of Attention on the Processing of Motion in Macaque Middle Temporal and Medial Superior Temporal Visual Cortical Areas , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[17]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Statistically Efficient Estimation Using Population Coding , 1998, Neural Computation.

[19]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Narrow Versus Wide Tuning Curves: What's Best for a Population Code? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[20]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Theory of point estimation , 1950 .

[22]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Attention modulation of neural tuning through peak and base rate in correlated firing , 2002, Neural Networks.

[23]  E N Brown,et al.  A Statistical Paradigm for Neural Spike Train Decoding Applied to Position Prediction from Ensemble Firing Patterns of Rat Hippocampal Place Cells , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Movshon,et al.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Mutual Information, Fisher Information, and Population Coding , 1998, Neural Computation.

[26]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  Probability Density Methods for Smooth Function Approximation and Learning in Populations of Tuned Spiking Neurons , 1998, Neural Computation.

[27]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[28]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Variability and Correlated Noise in the Discharge of Neurons in Motor and Parietal Areas of the Primate Cortex , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  B. C. Motter.  Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Seeing White: Qualia in the Context of Decoding Population Codes , 1999, Neural Computation.

[32]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[33]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Coding and Decoding in a Neural Field: A Computational Study , 2002, Neural Computation.

[34]  Shumeet Baluja,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing , 1994 .

[35]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.

[36]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4 , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Network model of shape-from-shading: neural function arises from both receptive and projective fields , 1988, Nature.

[39]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic Interpretation of Population Codes , 1996, Neural Computation.

[40]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[41]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  D. Perrett,et al.  The `Ideal Homunculus': decoding neural population signals , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[43]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Decoding Based on an Unfaithful Model , 1999, NIPS.

[44]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.