The orthographic uniqueness point and eye movements during reading.

Recent research found that naming and lexical decision times for words with an early orthographic uniqueness point (OUP) were faster than for words with a late OUP (Kwantes & Mewhort, 1999a; Lindell, Nicholls, & Castles, 2003). A word's OUP corresponds to the letter position in the word where that word is differentiated from other words. These results have been presented as evidence for sequential letter processing in visual word recognition (Kwantes & Mewhort, 1999a). In two experiments, we attempted to extend these results to a more natural reading situation by recording participants' eye movements. Readers read sentences with early or late OUP words embedded in them. In both experiments, we manipulated the amount of parafoveal information available during reading. Readers did not show any consistent benefit for reading words with an early OUP regardless of the amount of preview available. Our results are at odds with the naming and lexical decision data and prove problematic for models that predict OUP effects.

[1]  T. M. Ellison,et al.  Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. , 2000, Psychological review.

[2]  Derek Besner,et al.  When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[5]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[6]  D. Balota,et al.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: time course of perceptual, lexical, and contextual processes , 1991 .

[9]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. , 1965 .

[11]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[12]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[13]  K. Lamberts.  Interpretation of orthographic uniqueness point effects in visual word recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  H. Bouma.  Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.

[15]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[16]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[21]  A W Inhoff,et al.  Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  K. Rayner.  Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.

[23]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[26]  J. Hyönä,et al.  The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .

[27]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition. , 1999 .

[28]  K. Rayner,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998 .

[29]  W S Murray,et al.  Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis. , 2004, Psychological review.

[30]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  G. McConkie,et al.  Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading , 1985 .

[33]  M. Fischer.  Word Centre is Misperceived , 2000, Perception.

[34]  G. McConkie,et al.  Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  K. Rayner,et al.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[36]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The Effect of Orthographic Uniqueness and Deviation Points on Lexical Decisions: Evidence from Unilateral and Bilateral-Redundant Presentations , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.