Development of a Bone-Conducted Ultrasonic Hearing Aid for the Profoundly Deaf: Evaluation of Sound Quality Using a Semantic Differential Method

Bone-conducted ultrasound (BCU) is perceived even by the profoundly sensorineural deaf. A novel hearing aid using the perception of amplitude-modulated BCU (BCU hearing aid: BCUHA) has been developed. However, there is room for improvement particularly in terms of sound quality. BCU speech is accompanied by a strong high-pitched tone and contain some distortion. In this study, the sound quality of BCU speech with several types of amplitude modulation [double-sideband with transmitted carrier (DSB-TC), double-sideband with suppressed carrier (DSB-SC), and transposed modulations] and air-conducted (AC) speech was quantitatively evaluated using semantic differential and factor analysis. The results showed that all the types of BCU speech had higher metallic and lower esthetic factor scores than AC speech. On the other hand, transposed speech was closer than the other types of BCU speech to AC speech generally; the transposed speech showed a higher powerfulness factor score than the other types of BCU speech and a higher esthetic factor score than DSB-SC speech. These results provide useful information for further development of the BCUHA.

[1]  R. Pumphrey Upper Limit of Frequency for Human Hearing , 1950, Nature.

[2]  Isamu Ozaki,et al.  Brain topography and multimodal imaging , 2009 .

[3]  Seiji Nakagawa,et al.  Nonlinear explanation for bone-conducted ultrasonic hearing , 2005, Hearing Research.

[4]  Kazuhito Ito,et al.  Perception Mechanisms of Bone-Conducted Ultrasound Assessed by Acoustic Characteristics in the External Auditory Meatus , 2010 .

[5]  Kazuhito Ito,et al.  Assessment of Linearity of Bone-Conducted Ultrasound Transmission in the Human Head , 2011 .

[6]  Hiroshi Hosoi,et al.  Activation of the auditory cortex by ultrasound , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  M. Yamaguchi,et al.  Characteristics of auditory perception of bone-conducted ultrasound in humans revealed by magnetoencephalography , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Takayuki Kagomiya,et al.  Development of Bone-Conducted Ultrasonic Hearing Aid for the Profoundly Deaf: Assessments of the Modulation Type with Regard to Intelligibility and Sound Quality , 2012 .

[10]  R. Bellucci,et al.  LXI Some Observations on Ultrasonic Perception in Man , 1962 .

[11]  S. Nakagawa,et al.  Mechanisms of bone‐conducted ultrasonic perception assessed by electrophysiological measurements in human , 2006 .

[12]  H. Ertel,et al.  Some thoughts on the perception of ultrasonics by man , 1975, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.

[13]  M. Tonoike,et al.  Intelligibility of bone-conducted ultrasonic speech , 2005, Hearing Research.

[14]  M. Lenhardt,et al.  Human ultrasonic speech perception. , 1991, Science.

[15]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  Loudness and timbre of broad-band noise mixed with frequency modulated sounds , 1992 .

[16]  S. Nakagawa,et al.  Ultrasonic masker clarifies ultrasonic perception in man , 2003, Hearing Research.