Photoanthropometric face iridial proportions for age estimation: An investigation using features selected via a joint mutual information criterion.

Age assessment from images is of high interest in the forensic community because of the necessity to establish formal protocols to identify child pornography, child missing and abuses where visual evidences are the mostly admissible. Recently, photoanthropometric methods have been found useful for age estimation correlating facial proportions in image databases with samples of some age groups. Notwithstanding the advances, newer facial features and further analysis are needed to improve accuracy and establish larger applicability. In this investigation, frontal images of 1000 individuals (500 females, 500 males), equally distributed in five age groups (6, 10, 14, 18, 22 years old) were used in a 10 fold cross-validated experiment for three age thresholds classifications (<10, <14, <18 years old). A set of novel 40 features, based on a relation between landmark distances and the iris diameter, is proposed and joint mutual information is used to select the most relevant and complementary features for the classification task. In a civil image identification database with diverse ancestry, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to verify accuracy, and the resultant AUCs achieved 0.971, 0.969, and 0.903 for the age classifications (<10, <14, <18 years old), respectively. These results add support to continuing research in age assessment from images using the metric approach. Still, larger samples are necessary to evaluate reliability in extensive conditions.

[1]  Peter Vanezis,et al.  Failure of Anthropometry as a Facial Identification Technique Using High‐Quality Photographs * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Colas Schretter,et al.  Information-Theoretic Feature Selection in Microarray Data Using Variable Complementarity , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[3]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[4]  Reuben Moreton,et al.  Investigation into the use of photoanthropometry in facial image comparison. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[5]  Jean-Marie Parel,et al.  Human ocular biometry. , 2012, Experimental eye research.

[6]  A. Trussler Facial Geometry: Graphic Facial Analysis for Forensic Artists , 2008 .

[7]  M. Guerzoni,et al.  Pitfalls at the root of facial assessment on photographs: a quantitative study of accuracy in positioning facial landmarks , 2013, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[8]  M. Ratnayake,et al.  The juvenile face as a suitable age indicator in child pornography cases: a pilot study on the reliability of automated and visual estimation approaches , 2014, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[9]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  Yaman Akdeniz Internet Child Pornography and the Law: National and International Responses , 2008 .

[12]  Gavin Brown,et al.  Conditional Likelihood Maximisation: A Unifying Framework for Information Theoretic Feature Selection , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[14]  S. Ritz‐Timme,et al.  The identification of living persons on images: A literature review. , 2016, Legal medicine.

[15]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[16]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[17]  J. Siebert,et al.  A study of quantitative comparisons of photographs and video images based on landmark derived feature vectors. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[18]  E. Salter,et al.  Craniofacial Anthropometry: Practical Measurement of the Head and Face for Clinical, Surgical, and Research Use , 1997 .

[19]  Pasquale Poppa,et al.  Can facial proportions taken from images be of use for ageing in cases of suspected child pornography? A pilot study , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[20]  L. Farkas,et al.  Growth patterns of the face: a morphometric study. , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[21]  John E. Moody,et al.  Data Visualization and Feature Selection: New Algorithms for Nongaussian Data , 1999, NIPS.

[22]  J M Tanner,et al.  Misuse of Tanner puberty stages to estimate chronologic age. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[23]  A. Cigada,et al.  Towards a method for determining age ranges from faces of juveniles on photographs. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[24]  G. Roberts,et al.  Ages of legal importance: Implications in relation to birth registration and age assessment practices , 2016, Medicine, science, and the law.

[25]  Marco Grandi,et al.  The difficult issue of age assessment on pedo-pornographic material. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[26]  S Miyasaka,et al.  Photo anthropometric variations in Japanese facial features: Establishment of large-sample standard reference data for personal identification using a three-dimensional capture system. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[27]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Soft-tissue facial morphometry from 6 years to adulthood: a three-dimensional growth study using a new modeling. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.