Do synergies decrease force variability? A study of single-finger and multi-finger force production

We tested a hypothesis that force production by multi-finger groups leads to lower indices of force variability as compared to similar single-finger tasks. Three experiments were performed with quick force production, steady-state force production under visual feedback, and steady-state force production without visual feedback. In all experiments, a range of force levels was used computed as percentages of the maximal voluntary contraction force for each involved finger combination. Force standard deviation increased linearly with force magnitude across all three experiments and all finger combinations. There were modest differences between multi-finger and single-finger tasks in the indices of force variability, significant only in the tasks with steady-state force production under visual feedback. When fingers acted in groups, each finger showed significantly higher force variability as compared to its single-finger task and as compared to the multi-finger group as a whole. Fingers that were not instructed to produce force also showed close to linear relations between force standard deviation and force magnitude. For these fingers, indices of force variability were much higher as compared to those computed for the forces produced by instructed fingers. We interpret the findings within a feed-forward scheme of multi-finger control with two inputs only one of which is related to the explicit task. The total force variability reflects variability in only the task-related component, while variability of the finger forces is also due to variability of the component that is not related to the task. The findings tentatively suggest that total force variability originates at an upper level of the control hierarchy in accordance to the Weber–Fechner law rather than reflects a “neural noise” at the segmental level.

[1]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor variability within a multi-effector system: experimental and analytical studies of multi-finger production of quick force pulses , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  J. Foley The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1968 .

[4]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Review: Neural Coding and the Basic Law of Psychophysics , 2002, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[5]  C. Moritz,et al.  Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Les G Carlton,et al.  Modeling Variability of Force During Isometric Contractions of the Quadriceps Femoris , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Feed-forward control of a redundant motor system , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  K M Newell,et al.  Variability and Noise in Continuous Force Production , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  L. Carlton,et al.  Force Control Is Greater in the Upper Compared With the Lower Extremity , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  M. Latash,et al.  Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Latash,et al.  Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Marcos Duarte,et al.  Do synergies improve accuracy? A study of speed-accuracy trade-offs during finger force production. , 2008, Motor control.

[14]  M. Latash,et al.  What do synergies do? Effects of secondary constraints on multidigit synergies in accurate force-production tasks. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  K. Newell,et al.  Noise, information transmission, and force variability. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[18]  Sun Wook Kim,et al.  Finger inter-dependence: linking the kinetic and kinematic variables. , 2008, Human Movement Science.

[19]  T. Ohtsuki Inhibition of individual fingers during grip strength exertion. , 1981, Ergonomics.

[20]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  A central back-coupling hypothesis on the organization of motor synergies: a physical metaphor and a neural model , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[22]  Halla B. Olafsdottir,et al.  The emergence and disappearance of multi-digit synergies during force-production tasks , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Stacey L. Gorniak,et al.  Hierarchies of synergies: an example of two-hand, multi-finger tasks , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M. Turvey Action and perception at the level of synergies. , 2007, Human movement science.

[25]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Information and force level interact in regulating force output during two and three digit grip configurations , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  A. Sillito,et al.  Spatial organization and magnitude of orientation contrast interactions in primate V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[28]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Anticipatory covariation of finger forces during self-paced and reaction time force production , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  H. Pashler,et al.  Confidence and Accuracy of Near-Threshold Discrimination Responses , 2001, Consciousness and Cognition.

[30]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  A mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force-production tasks , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  Anatol G. Feldman,et al.  Threshold position control of arm movement with anticipatory increase in grip force , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  K. Newell,et al.  Force variability in isometric responses. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  K M Newell,et al.  Impulse variability in isometric tasks. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[36]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Toward a new theory of motor synergies. , 2007, Motor control.

[37]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Inter-digit individuation and force variability in the precision grip of young, elderly, and Parkinson's disease participants. , 2002, Motor control.

[38]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[39]  M. Latash,et al.  Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  M. Latash,et al.  Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  François G. Meyer,et al.  Coherence at 16-32 Hz can be caused by short-term synchrony of motor units. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.