Estimating adaptive cruise control model parameters from on-board radar units

Two new methods are presented for estimating car-following model parameters using data collected from the Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) enabled vehicles. The vehicle is assumed to follow a constant time headway relative velocity model in which the parameters are unknown and to be determined. The first technique is a batch method that uses a least-squares approach to estimate the parameters from time series data of the vehicle speed, space gap, and relative velocity of a lead vehicle. The second method is an online approach that uses a particle filter to simultaneously estimate both the state of the system and the model parameters. Numerical experiments demonstrate the accuracy and computational performance of the methods relative to a commonly used simulation-based optimization approach. The methods are also assessed on empirical data collected from a 2019 model year ACC vehicle driven in a highway environment. Speed, space gap, and relative velocity data are recorded directly from the factory-installed radar unit via the vehicle's CAN bus. All three methods return similar mean absolute error values in speed and spacing compared to the recorded data. The least-squares method has the fastest run-time performance, and is up to 3 orders of magnitude faster than other methods. The particle filter is faster than real-time, and therefore is suitable in streaming applications in which the datasets can grow arbitrarily large.

[1]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  Do We Really Need to Calibrate All the Parameters? Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis to Simplify Microscopic Traffic Flow Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Calibrating Car-Following Models by Using Trajectory Data , 2008, 0803.4063.

[3]  Christine Buisson,et al.  Estimating Individual Speed-Spacing Relationship and Assessing Ability of Newell's Car-Following Model to Reproduce Trajectories , 2008 .

[4]  Li Li,et al.  Calibration of MITSIM and IDM car-following model based on NGSIM trajectory datasets , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety.

[5]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  Analysis and Comparison of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models with Real Traffic Microscopic Data , 2005 .

[6]  R. E. Wilson,et al.  Car-following models: fifty years of linear stability analysis – a mathematical perspective , 2011 .

[7]  Daniel B. Work,et al.  Model-Based String Stability of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems Using Field Data , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

[8]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Platoon of SAE Level-2 Automated Vehicles on Public Roads: Setup, Traffic Interactions, and Stability , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[9]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Daniel B. Work,et al.  Modeling adaptive cruise control vehicles from experimental data: model comparison , 2019, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC).

[11]  Vinny Cahill,et al.  Real-Time Estimation of Drivers' Behaviour , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Evaluation of traffic data obtained via GPS-enabled mobile phones: The Mobile Century field experiment , 2009 .

[13]  Beckmann Daniel,et al.  Comparison of online-parameter estimation methods applied to a linear belt drive system , 2016 .

[14]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[15]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  String Stability and a Delay-Based Spacing Policy for Vehicle Platoons Subject to Disturbances , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Mélanie Bouroche,et al.  Robust parameter estimation of car-following models considering practical non-identifiability , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[17]  Dan Simon,et al.  Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H∞, and Nonlinear Approaches , 2006 .

[18]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data , 2014 .

[19]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Intelligent cruise control: theory and experiment , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[20]  Maria Laura Delle Monache,et al.  Are Commercially Implemented Adaptive Cruise Control Systems String Stable? , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Nakayama,et al.  Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.