A decade of tomography

Over the past 10 years, ray-based postmigration grid tomography has become the standard model-building tool for seismic depth imaging. While the basics of the method have remained unchanged since the late 1990s, the problems it solves have changed dramatically. This evolution has been driven by exploration demands and enabled by computer power. There are three main areas of change. First, standard model resolution has increased from a few thousand meters to a few hundred meters. This order of magnitude improvement may be attributed to both high-quality, complex residual-moveout data picked as densely as 25 m to 50 m vertically and horizontally, and to a strategy of working down from long-wavelength to short-wavelength solutions. Second, more and more seismic data sets are being acquired along multiple azimuths, for improved illumination and multiple suppression. High-resolution velocity tomography must solve for all azimuths simultaneously, to prevent short-wavelength velocity heterogeneity from being mistaken for azimuthal anisotropy. Third, there has been a shift from predominantly isotropic to predominantly anisotropic models, both VTI and TTI. With four-component data, anisotropic grid tomography can be used to build models that tie PZ and PS images in depth.

[1]  S. Deregowski,et al.  Common-offset migrations and velocity analysis , 1990 .

[2]  Paul Sava,et al.  Wave-Equation Migration Velocity Analysis , 2004 .

[3]  C. Sayers Sensitivity of elastic-wave velocities to stress changes in sandstones , 2005 .

[4]  John Etgen,et al.  3D Full Waveform Inversion: Wide Versus Narrow Azimuth Acquisitions , 2007 .

[5]  Paul Sava,et al.  Wave-equation migration velocity analysis. I. Theory , 2004 .

[6]  Robert Bloor,et al.  Building Velocity Models Using Tomography , 1998 .

[7]  T. Johns,et al.  Anisotropic PP And PSv Prestack Depth Migration of 4C Seismic Data: Pamberi, Trinidad , 2007 .

[8]  Robert G. Clapp Geologically constrained migration velocity analysis , 2000 .

[9]  Paul Farmer,et al.  Automated 3D Tomographic Velocity Analysis of Residual Moveout In Prestack Depth Migrated Common Image Point Gathers. , 1998 .

[10]  Marta Woodward,et al.  Wave-equation tomography , 1992 .

[11]  J. Scales,et al.  Robust methods in inverse theory , 1988 .

[12]  Jerry Kapoor,et al.  Subsalt imaging: The RAZ–WAZ experience , 2007 .

[13]  L. Thomsen Weak elastic anisotropy , 1986 .

[14]  A Continuation Approach to Regularization For Traveltime Tomography , 1994 .

[15]  Bin Wang,et al.  3D Sub-Salt Tomography Based on Wave Equation Migration Perturbation Scans , 2004 .

[16]  J. Claerbout,et al.  Incorporating geologic information into reflection tomography , 2004 .

[17]  C. Sayers,et al.  Seismic pore-pressure prediction using reflection tomography and 4-C seismic data , 2002 .

[18]  Bin Wang,et al.  A 3D subsalt tomography based on wave-equation migration-perturbation scans , 2006 .

[19]  Christof Stork,et al.  REFLECTION TOMOGRAPHY IN THE POSTMIGRATED DOMAIN , 1992 .

[20]  Bin Wang,et al.  Macro Velocity Model Estimation Through Model-based Globally-optimized Residual-curvature Analysis , 1995 .

[21]  Kamal M. Al-Yahya,et al.  Velocity analysis by iterative profile migration , 1987 .