The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension

Ferreira and colleagues argued that the language comprehension system creates syntactic and semantic representations that are merely ‘good enough’ (GE) given the task that the comprehender needs to perform. GE representations contrast with ones that are detailed, complete, and accurate with respect to the input. In this article, we review the original argument for GE processing, and we present new evidence that supports the concept: first, local interpretations are computed, which can interfere with global ones; second, new findings based on the recording of event-related potentials show the use of simple heuristics rather than compositional algorithms for constructing sentence meaning; and recent studies show that the comprehension system has mechanisms for handling disfluencies, but they work imperfectly. We argue that the GE approach to language comprehension is similar to the use of fast and frugal heuristics for decision-making, and that future research should explore this connection more thoroughly.

[1]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing , 2004 .

[2]  J. E. Tree The Effects of False Starts and Repetitions on the Processing of Subsequent Words in Spontaneous Speech , 1995 .

[3]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules , 2001 .

[4]  Frieda Goldman Eisler Psycholinguistics : experiments in spontaneous speech , 1968 .

[5]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation , 1994 .

[6]  Stephen B. Barton,et al.  A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[7]  J. Henderson,et al.  Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences ☆ , 1991 .

[8]  M. Pickering,et al.  Processing ambiguous verbs: evidence from eye movements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[10]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Disfluencies, parsing, and tree-adjoining grammars , 2004 .

[12]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[13]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[14]  Brandon R. Schrand Works Cited , 1991, Bach's Cycle, Mozart's Arrow.

[15]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[17]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[19]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[20]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[21]  K Christianson,et al.  Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[22]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Garden Path Re-Analysis: Attach (Anyway) and Revision as Last Resort , 2000 .

[23]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing , 1980, Brain and Language.

[27]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  David Bailey,et al.  DISFLUENT SPEECH AND THE VISUAL WORLD: AN APPLICATION OF THE VISUAL WORLD PARADIGM TO THE STUDY OF SPOKEN LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION By , 2004 .

[29]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Disfluencies, language comprehension, and Tree Adjoining Grammars , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[31]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[32]  M. Mattson,et al.  From words to meaning: A semantic illusion , 1981 .

[33]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Younger and Older Adults' "Good-Enough" Interpretations of Garden-Path Sentences , 2006, Discourse processes.

[34]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[35]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Lingering effects of disfluent material on comprehension of garden path sentences , 2005 .

[36]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[39]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Taking on semantic commitments, II: collective versus distributive readings , 1999, Cognition.

[40]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences , 2003 .

[41]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.