Spatial Spread of Visual Attention while Tracking a Moving Object

We conducted three experiments to investigate the spatial spread of visual attention. In Experiment 1, we measured the contrast sensitivities at various locations (spatial sensitivity function) relative to the moving target that the observer attended to track in an attentive tracking display. A probe was presented at a distance from the target at a location randomly chosen from within a certain range. The range of probe presentation location varied to examine whether the observer changes the area of attention to cope with this range. The results show that the probe range influenced the shape of spatial sensitivity function. The change in shape of this function suggests that the observer covers a wider area with attention for large probe ranges than small probe ranges. In the following experiments, we investigated the effect of the distance between the tracking target and a probe at a fixed location relative to the target (Experiment 2), or between the target and the center of a probe range of fixed size (Experiment 3). Since the relative probe location in a session was fixed in the experiments, the observer would pay attention to the target and probe locations independently of the relative distance if he/she could focus attention at multiple locations. Spatial sensitivity functions obtained in Experiments 2 and 3 showed that this was not the case. In both experiments the sensitivity to the probe decreased with increase in the relative distance as in Experiment 1, where the probe was presented at a location randomly chosen within each range. This indicates that attention cannot be divided among multiple locations, at least under the present experimental conditions. We will discuss a possible interpretation of the present results with a limited attentional resource and its spatial distribution.

[1]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[3]  Mark M Schira,et al.  Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Hirohisa Yaguchi,et al.  Smooth shifts of visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.

[5]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Martin Eimer,et al.  An ERP study of sustained spatial attention to stimulus eccentricity , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .

[10]  U. Castiello,et al.  Splitting focal attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  C. J. Downing Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  E L Wilding,et al.  Indexing strategic retrieval of colour information with event-related potentials. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  Diego Fernandez-Duque,et al.  Attention Metaphors: How Metaphors Guide the Cognitive Psychology of Attention , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  R. Klein,et al.  Splitting versus sharing focal attention: comment on Castiello and Umiltà (1992). , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  U. Castiello,et al.  Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[16]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[17]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking the apparent location of targets in interpolated motion , 2000, Vision Research.

[18]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking , 2001, Vision Research.

[19]  J. Henderson,et al.  Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based motion perception. , 1992, Science.