Using FRAP and mathematical modeling to determine the in vivo kinetics of nuclear proteins.

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) has become a popular technique to investigate the behavior of proteins in living cells. Although the technique is relatively old, its application to studying endogenous intracellular proteins in living cells is relatively recent and is a consequence of the newly developed fluorescent protein-based living cell protein tags. This is particularly true for nuclear proteins, in which endogenous protein mobility has only recently been studied. Here we examine the experimental design and analysis of FRAP experiments. Mathematical modeling of FRAP data enables the experimentalist to extract information such as the association and dissociation constants, distribution of a protein between mobile and immobilized pools, and the effective diffusion coefficient of the molecule under study. As experimentalists begin to dissect the relative influence of protein domains within individual proteins, this approach will allow a quantitative assessment of the relative influences of different molecular interactions on the steady-state distribution and protein function in vivo.

[1]  F. Boisvert,et al.  Compartmentalization of regulatory proteins in the cell nucleus , 2001, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[2]  T. Pederson,et al.  Protein Mobility within the Nucleus—What Are the Right Moves? , 2001, Cell.

[3]  F. Boisvert,et al.  The Transcription Coactivator Cbp Is a Dynamic Component of the Promyelocytic Leukemia Nuclear Body , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  R. Goldman,et al.  Nuclear Lamins a and B1: Different Pathways of Assembly during Nuclear Envelope Formation in Living Cells , 2000 .

[5]  T Misteli,et al.  Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. , 2001, Science.

[6]  P. O’Hare,et al.  Fate of the Inner Nuclear Membrane Protein Lamin B Receptor and Nuclear Lamins in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[7]  J. Trowsdale,et al.  Dynamics of proteasome distribution in living cells , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[8]  M. Hendzel,et al.  Rapid exchange of histone H1.1 on chromatin in living human cells , 2000, Nature.

[9]  A. Verkman,et al.  Diffusion Measurements by Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching , 2001 .

[10]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[11]  W. Rodgers,et al.  Transient Association of Ku with Nuclear Substrates Characterized Using Fluorescence Photobleaching1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  Nuclear pore complexes form immobile networks and have a very low turnover in live mammalian cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  Eric Verdin,et al.  Reduced Mobility of the Alternate Splicing Factor (Asf) through the Nucleoplasm and Steady State Speckle Compartments , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  J H Hartwig,et al.  Simultaneous measurements of actin filament turnover, filament fraction, and monomer diffusion in endothelial cells. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[15]  M. Edidin,et al.  Lateral diffusion of rhodopsin in photoreceptor cells measured by fluorescence photobleaching and recovery. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Adriaan B. Houtsmuller,et al.  Macromolecular dynamics in living cell nuclei revealed by fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching , 2001, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[17]  Y. Mo,et al.  Rapid exchange of mammalian topoisomerase IIα at kinetochores and chromosome arms in mitosis , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  P. Collas,et al.  HA95 is a protein of the chromatin and nuclear matrix regulating nuclear envelope dynamics. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[19]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Dynamic binding of histone H1 to chromatin in living cells , 2000, Nature.

[20]  J. Westwater,et al.  The Mathematics of Diffusion. , 1957 .

[21]  A. Lamond,et al.  Dynamic targeting of protein phosphatase 1 within the nuclei of living mammalian cells. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[22]  I. Kerr,et al.  STAT1 from the cell membrane to the DNA , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[23]  Howard J. Worman,et al.  Nuclear Membrane Dynamics and Reassembly in Living Cells: Targeting of an Inner Nuclear Membrane Protein in Interphase and Mitosis , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  B. O’Malley,et al.  FRAP reveals that mobility of oestrogen receptor-α is ligand- and proteasome-dependent , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  Morten O. Christensen,et al.  Changes in Mobility Account for Camptothecin-induced Subnuclear Relocation of Topoisomerase I* 210 , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  J H Hartwig,et al.  Interpreting photoactivated fluorescence microscopy measurements of steady-state actin dynamics. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[27]  T. Pederson Diffusional protein transport within the nucleus: a message in the medium , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[28]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Dynamics and mobility of nuclear envelope proteins in interphase and mitotic cells revealed by green fluorescent protein chimeras. , 1999, Methods.

[29]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Intracellular trafficking of emerin, the Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy protein. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[30]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Kinetic modelling approaches to in vivo imaging , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Nup98 is a mobile nucleoporin with transcription-dependent dynamics. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[32]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[33]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[34]  A. Verkman Solute and macromolecule diffusion in cellular aqueous compartments. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[35]  J. McNally,et al.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.

[36]  H. Tanke,et al.  Mutational Analysis of Fibrillarin and Its Mobility in Living Human Cells , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  A. Houtsmuller,et al.  Action of DNA repair endonuclease ERCC1/XPF in living cells. , 1999, Science.

[38]  J Langowski,et al.  Anomalous diffusion of fluorescent probes inside living cell nuclei investigated by spatially-resolved fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Sui Huang,et al.  Nucleolar Components Involved in Ribosome Biogenesis Cycle between the Nucleolus and Nucleoplasm in Interphase Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  Leann Tilley,et al.  Fluorescence photobleaching analysis for the study of cellular dynamics , 2002, European Biophysics Journal.

[41]  T. Misteli,et al.  High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus , 2000, Nature.

[42]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  Kinetics of Core Histones in Living Human Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Studying protein dynamics in living cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  ZAP-70 Association with T Cell Receptor ζ (TCRζ): Fluorescence Imaging of Dynamic Changes upon Cellular Stimulation , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  A. Verkman,et al.  Translational Diffusion of Macromolecule-sized Solutes in Cytoplasm and Nucleus , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  E. Elson,et al.  Distribution and lateral mobility of voltage-dependent sodium channels in neurons [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1989 May;108(5):preceding 2001] , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  Wim Vermeulen,et al.  Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage , 2002, The EMBO journal.