On the handling performance of a vehicle with different front-to-rear wheel torque distributions

ABSTRACT The handling characteristic is a classical topic of vehicle dynamics. Usually, vehicle handling is studied by analyzing the understeer coefficient in quasi-steady-state maneuvers. In this paper, experimental tests are performed on an electric vehicle with four independent motors, which is able to reproduce front-wheel-drive, rear-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive (FWD, RWD and AWD, respectively) architectures. The handling characteristics of each architecture are inferred through classical and new concepts. The study presents a procedure to compute the longitudinal and lateral tire forces, which is based on a first estimate and a subsequent correction of the tire forces that guarantee the equilibrium. A yaw moment analysis is performed to identify the contributions of the longitudinal and lateral forces. The results show a good agreement between the classical and new formulations of the understeer coefficient, and allow to infer a relationship between the understeer coefficient and the yaw moment analysis. The handling characteristics vary with speed and front-to-rear wheel torque distribution. An apparently surprising result arises at low speed: the RWD architecture is the most understeering configuration. This is discussed by analyzing the yaw moment caused by the longitudinal forces of the front tires, which is significant for high values of lateral acceleration and steering angle.

[1]  Marco Gadola,et al.  On the vehicle sideslip angle estimation: a literature review of methods, models and innovations , 2018 .

[2]  Francesco Frendo,et al.  A new formulation of the understeer coefficient to relate yaw torque and vehicle handling , 2016 .

[3]  A. T. van Zanten,et al.  Bosch ESP Systems: 5 Years of Experience , 2000 .

[4]  Hans B. Pacejka,et al.  Tire and Vehicle Dynamics , 1982 .

[5]  Francesco Timpone,et al.  TRIP-ID: A tool for a smart and interactive identification of Magic Formula tyre model parameters from experimental data acquired on track or test rig , 2018 .

[6]  Kazuhiko Shimada,et al.  IMPROVEMENT OF VEHICLE MANEUVERABILITY BY DIRECT YAW MOMENT CONTROL. , 1992 .

[7]  Aldo Sorniotti,et al.  Understeer characteristics for energy-efficient fully electric vehicles with multiple motors , 2016 .

[8]  Aldo Sorniotti,et al.  Energy-Efficient Torque-Vectoring Control of Electric Vehicles With Multiple Drivetrains , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Francesco Timpone,et al.  A combined use of phase plane and handling diagram method to study the influence of tyre and vehicle characteristics on stability , 2013 .

[10]  Aldo Sorniotti,et al.  A gain scheduled robust linear quadratic regulator for vehicle direct yaw moment control , 2018 .

[11]  Cheng Lin,et al.  Wheel Torque Distribution of Four-Wheel-Drive Electric Vehicles Based on Multi-Objective Optimization , 2015 .

[12]  Massimo Guiggiani,et al.  Critical review of handling diagram and understeer gradient for vehicles with locked differential , 2006 .

[13]  Massimo Guiggiani,et al.  The Science of Vehicle Dynamics: Handling, Braking, and Ride of Road and Race Cars , 2014 .

[14]  N. F. Barter.  Analysis and Interpretation of Steady-State and Transient Vehicle Response Measurements , 1976 .

[15]  Massimo Guiggiani,et al.  The handling surface: a new perspective in vehicle dynamics , 2007 .

[16]  Patrick Gruber,et al.  Torque Distribution Strategies for Energy-Efficient Electric Vehicles With Multiple Drivetrains , 2017 .

[17]  Taehyun Shim,et al.  Independent control of all-wheel-drive torque distribution , 2006 .

[18]  Aldo Sorniotti,et al.  On the experimental analysis of single input single output control of yaw rate and sideslip angle , 2017 .

[19]  Georg Rill.  Reducing the cornering resistance by torque vectoring , 2017 .

[20]  Aldo Sorniotti,et al.  Driving modes for designing the cornering response of fully electric vehicles with multiple motors , 2015 .

[21]  Adi Ben-Israel,et al.  Generalized inverses: theory and applications , 1974 .

[22]  Aldo Sorniotti,et al.  Direct yaw moment control actuated through electric drivetrains and friction brakes: Theoretical design and experimental assessment , 2015 .

[23]  Makul K. Verma.  TRANSIENT RESPONSE TEST PROCEDURES FOR MEASURING VEHICLE DIRECTIONAL CONTROL , 1981 .

[24]  Avesta Goodarzi,et al.  Optimal yaw moment control law for improved vehicle handling , 2003 .

[25]  Patrick Gruber,et al.  Comparison of Feedback Control Techniques for Torque-Vectoring Control of Fully Electric Vehicles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[26]  T. B. Sheridan.  Vehicle Handling: Mathematical Characteristics of the Driver , 1963 .

[27]  Eduardo Domingo Morales.  Sensitivity study of front suspension parameters in elastokinematics and handling behavior of a vehicle , 2016 .

[28]  Donald L. Nordeen.  Vehicle Handling: Its Dependence Upon Vehicle Parameters , 1964 .

[29]  Francesco Frendo,et al.  The effect of the front-to-rear wheel torque distribution on vehicle handling: an experimental assessment , 2018 .

[30]  Mauro Velardocchia,et al.  On the Experimental Analysis of Integral Sliding Modes for Yaw Rate and Sideslip Control of an Electric Vehicle with Multiple Motors , 2018, International Journal of Automotive Technology.

[31]  Gwanghun. Gim,et al.  Vehicle dynamic simulation with a comprehensive model for pneumatic tires. , 1988 .

[32]  Hans B. Pacejka.  Simplified Analysis of Steady-state Turning Behaviour of Motor Vehicles. Part 1. Handling Diagrams of Simple Systems. , 1973 .

[33]  Aldo Sorniotti,et al.  Design and comparison of the handling performance of different electric vehicle layouts , 2014 .

[34]  Giancarlo Genta,et al.  Motor Vehicle Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation , 1997, Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences.