Distinct conformational and energetic features define the specific recognition of (di)aromatic peptide motifs by PEX14

Abstract The cycling import receptor PEX5 and its membrane-located binding partner PEX14 are key constituents of the peroxisomal import machinery. Upon recognition of newly synthesized cargo proteins carrying a peroxisomal targeting signal type 1 (PTS1) in the cytosol, the PEX5/cargo complex docks at the peroxisomal membrane by binding to PEX14. The PEX14 N-terminal domain (NTD) recognizes (di)aromatic peptides, mostly corresponding to Wxxx(F/Y)-motifs, with nano-to micromolar affinity. Human PEX5 possesses eight of these conserved motifs distributed within its 320-residue disordered N-terminal region. Here, we combine biophysical (ITC, NMR, CD), biochemical and computational methods to characterize the recognition of these (di)aromatic peptides motifs and identify key features that are recognized by PEX14. Notably, the eight motifs present in human PEX5 exhibit distinct affinities and energetic contributions for the interaction with the PEX14 NTD. Computational docking and analysis of the interactions of the (di)aromatic motifs identify the specific amino acids features that stabilize a helical conformation of the peptide ligands and mediate interactions with PEX14 NTD. We propose a refined consensus motif ExWΦxE(F/Y)Φ for high affinity binding to the PEX14 NTD and discuss conservation of the (di)aromatic peptide recognition by PEX14 in other species.

[1]  D. Devos,et al.  Comparative Genomics of Peroxisome Biogenesis Proteins: Making Sense of the PEX Proteins , 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[2]  M. Sattler,et al.  Membrane Interactions of the Peroxisomal Proteins PEX5 and PEX14 , 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[3]  M. Sattler,et al.  Competitive Microtubule Binding of PEX14 Coordinates Peroxisomal Protein Import and Motility. , 2021, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Vishal C. Kalel,et al.  Structure-activity relationship in pyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridines, first inhibitors of PEX14-PEX5 Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) with trypanocidal activity. , 2019, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Shirisha Nagotu,et al.  Versatility of peroxisomes: An evolving concept. , 2017, Tissue & cell.

[6]  Vishal C. Kalel,et al.  Inhibitors of PEX14 disrupt protein import into glycosomes and kill Trypanosoma parasites , 2017, Science.

[7]  M. Wilmanns,et al.  Structural biology of the import pathways of peroxisomal matrix proteins. , 2016, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  M. Wilmanns,et al.  Towards the molecular mechanism of the integration of peroxisomal membrane proteins☆ , 2016, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[9]  M. Mizuguchi,et al.  Characterization of the interaction between Trypanosoma brucei Pex5p and its receptor Pex14p , 2016, FEBS letters.

[10]  A. Jardim,et al.  The Leishmania donovani peroxin 14 binding domain accommodates a high degeneracy in the pentapeptide motifs present on peroxin 5. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[11]  Daniel R Roe,et al.  PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[12]  F. Poulsen,et al.  Sequence correction of random coil chemical shifts: correlation between neighbor correction factors and changes in the Ramachandran distribution , 2011, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[13]  C. Herrmann,et al.  PEX14 is required for microtubule-based peroxisome motility in human cells , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  Iris Antes,et al.  DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics‐based algorithm for protein–peptide docking including receptor flexibility , 2010, Proteins.

[15]  W. Schliebs,et al.  The peroxisomal importomer constitutes a large and highly dynamic pore , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  M. Wilmanns,et al.  Structural basis for competitive interactions of Pex14 with the import receptors Pex5 and Pex19 , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[17]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Docking and scoring with alternative side‐chain conformations , 2009, Proteins.

[18]  Jianrui Su,et al.  Crystal structure of the conserved N-terminal domain of the peroxisomal matrix protein import receptor, Pex14p , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  IRECS: A new algorithm for the selection of most probable ensembles of side‐chain conformations in protein models , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  N. Greenfield Using circular dichroism collected as a function of temperature to determine the thermodynamics of protein unfolding and binding interactions , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[21]  W. Schliebs,et al.  Peroxisomal matrix protein import: the transient pore model , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  Wayne Boucher,et al.  The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline , 2005, Proteins.

[23]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[24]  J. Chiu,et al.  Site-directed, Ligase-Independent Mutagenesis (SLIM): a single-tube methodology approaching 100% efficiency in 4 h. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[26]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  W. Hol,et al.  Analysis of the sequence motifs responsible for the interactions of peroxins 14 and 5, which are involved in glycosome biogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[28]  D C Rees,et al.  Some thermodynamic implications for the thermostability of proteins , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[29]  P E Wright,et al.  Sequence-dependent correction of random coil NMR chemical shifts. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  P. Lazarow,et al.  Eci1p uses a PTS1 to enter peroxisomes: either its own or that of a partner, Dci1p. , 2001, European journal of cell biology.

[31]  C. Brocard,et al.  Pex14p is a member of the protein linkage map of Pex5p , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[32]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[33]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[34]  S Subramani,et al.  A conserved tripeptide sorts proteins to peroxisomes , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  S. Gould,et al.  Identification of a peroxisomal targeting signal at the carboxy terminus of firefly luciferase , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  Y. Fujiki,et al.  Biogenesis of peroxisomes. , 1985, Annual review of cell biology.

[37]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[38]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[39]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .