Test-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas.

AIM To determine the repeatability of three-dimensional echo planar imaging magnetic resonance (MR) elastography (3D EPI MRE) for assessing pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers, patients with chronic pancreatitis, and patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS 3D EPI MRE was used to assess pancreatic stiffness in five healthy volunteers, and five and three patients with histopathologically confirmed chronic pancreatitis and PDAC, respectively. The study participants underwent two scans, separated by a 1-day interval (referred to as time point 1 and time point 2). Scanning was performed using a 3 T MR machine using a multi-section EPI pulse sequence to assess the mean stiffness of the tumours in PDAC cases, and pancreatic parenchyma in chronic pancreatitis cases and healthy volunteers. A direct-inversion algorithm with 3D post-processing was used to estimate shear stiffness and generate elastograms. Stiffness was measured independently by two analysts. RESULTS Between the two analysts, the mean stiffness of all 13 pancreases was highly reproducible, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.975 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.945-0.989) across the two time points (r=0.973, p<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis found a difference in mean stiffness of 0.01 kPa (95% agreement limits: -0.53-0.55 kPa). Between the two time points, the ICC was 0.973 (95% CI: 0.941-0.988) across the two analysts (r=0.975, p<0.001), and the difference in stiffness by Bland-Altman analysis was 0.05 kPa (95% agreement limits: -0.51-0.60 kPa). The mean stiffness value of pancreases with PDAC was 2.89±1.20 kPa, which was significantly higher than that of normal pancreases (1.11±0.08 kPa, p<0.001) and of pancreases with chronic pancreatitis (1.53±0.04 kPa, p<0.001). CONCLUSION 3D-MRE is a highly reproducible method for assessing pancreatic stiffness.

[1]  S. Chari Chronic pancreatitis: classification, relationship to acute pancreatitis, and early diagnosis , 2006, Journal of Gastroenterology.

[2]  Qiyong Guo,et al.  Short- and midterm repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers at 3.0 T. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  H. Witt,et al.  Chronic pancreatitis: challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[4]  Rajiv Chopra,et al.  Incorporating endorectal MR elastography into multi‐parametric MRI for prostate cancer imaging: Initial feasibility in volunteers , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  F. Itokawa,et al.  EUS elastography combined with the strain ratio of tissue elasticity for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses , 2011, Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  R. Ehman,et al.  Prediction of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: usefulness of three-dimensional MR elastography with echo-planar imaging technique. , 2014, Radiology.

[7]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: preliminary results and estimation of inter-rater reliability , 2010, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[8]  C. Jack,et al.  Decreased brain stiffness in Alzheimer's disease determined by magnetic resonance elastography , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Scott B Reeder,et al.  Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  E. Godfrey,et al.  A comparison of MR elastography and 31P MR spectroscopy with histological staging of liver fibrosis , 2012, European Radiology.

[11]  Richard L Ehman,et al.  Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Clinical Applications , 2013, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  R. Ehman,et al.  Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Elastography , 2009, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[14]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  J. Iglesias-Garcia,et al.  The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in relation to other imaging modalities in the differential diagnosis between mass forming chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis and ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma , 2012 .

[16]  A. Manduca,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. , 1995, Science.

[17]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: A review , 2010, Clinical anatomy.

[18]  R. Ehman,et al.  Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  K. Sandrasegaran Functional MR imaging of the abdomen. , 2014, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Three‐dimensional subzone‐based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.