A methodology for assessing supply-demand matching of smart government services from citizens’ perspective: A case study in Nanjing, China

[1]  Jamshid Ali Turi,et al.  The role of awareness in appraising the success of E-government systems , 2023, Cogent Business & Management.

[2]  Ruoyu Wang,et al.  Establishing a citywide street tree inventory with street view images and computer vision techniques , 2023, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[3]  Bo Fan,et al.  Institutional Pressures, Policy Attention, and e-Government Service Capability: Evidence from China’s Prefecture-Level Cities , 2023, Public Performance & Management Review.

[4]  Nuseiba M. Altarawneh,et al.  Examining the antecedents and outcomes of smart government usage: An integrated model , 2022, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  B. Ampimah,et al.  Decision Optimization Techniques for Evaluating Renewable Energy Resources for Power Generation in Ghana: Mcdm Approach , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  Dezhi Li,et al.  Factors affecting sustainability of smart city services in China: From the perspective of citizens’ sense of gain , 2022, Habitat International.

[7]  Jilong Liu,et al.  Measurement and analysis of the resilience characteristics for a regional agricultural soil-water resource composite system. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Atsushi Ogihara,et al.  Behavioral Patterns of Supply and Demand Sides of Health Services for the Elderly in Sustainable Digital Transformation: A Mixed Methods Study , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  Ylber Januzaj,et al.  Cosine Similarity – A Computing Approach to Match Similarity Between Higher Education Programs and Job Market Demands Based on Maximum Number of Common Words , 2022, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET).

[10]  Guangming Lu,et al.  Printed label defect detection using twice gradient matching based on improved cosine similarity measure , 2022, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Wusi Zhou,et al.  Measuring demand and supply of community care services for older people healthy ageing in rural Zhejiang Province , 2022, BMC Geriatrics.

[12]  Peian Lv.  Research on the Application of Adaptive Matching Tracking Algorithm Fused with Neural Network in the Development of E-Government , 2022, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

[13]  Byungmo Kim,et al.  Investigation on Applicability and Limitation of Cosine Similarity-Based Structural Condition Monitoring for Gageocho Offshore Structure , 2022, Sensors.

[14]  T. Zhang,et al.  The Relationship between Government Information Supply and Public Information Demand in the Early Stage of COVID-19 in China—An Empirical Analysis , 2021, Healthcare.

[15]  Chang Liu,et al.  Improving electricity supply reliability in China: Cost and incentive regulation , 2021 .

[16]  N. Amor.  Exploring Citizens' Motives influencing the satisfaction with and adoption of E-Government Services in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia , 2021, FWU Journal of Social Sciences.

[17]  K. Leung,et al.  Implementing the smart city: who has a say? Some insights from Hong Kong , 2021, International Journal of Urban Sciences.

[18]  Dezhi Li,et al.  Influencing factors and their influencing mechanisms on urban resilience in China , 2021 .

[19]  W. Mansoor,et al.  An Empirical Study of Perception of the End-User on the Acceptance of Smart Government Service in the UAE , 2021, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[20]  Mutaz M. Al-Debei,et al.  Digitally Transforming Electronic Governments into Smart Governments: SMARTGOV, an Extended Maturity Model , 2021, Information Development.

[21]  Lan Xue,et al.  Analyzing the Critical Factors Influencing Post-Use Trust and Its Impact on Citizens’ Continuous-Use Intention of E-Government: Evidence from Chinese Municipalities , 2021, Sustainability.

[22]  Jiangbo Wang,et al.  How to peak carbon emissions of provincial construction industry? Scenario analysis of Jiangsu Province , 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[23]  Isaac Kofi Mensah,et al.  Exploring Factors Determining Chinese College Students' Satisfaction With E-Government Services: The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Approach , 2021, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[24]  T. Rovinskaya.  The Role of New Digital Technologies in a Time of Crisis , 2021, World Economy and International Relations.

[25]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Mobile services use and citizen satisfaction in government: integrating social benefits and uses and gratifications theory , 2021, Inf. Technol. People.

[26]  Chongli Huang,et al.  A SCI Analysis Model: Research on Influencing Factors of Local E-Government Responsiveness in China , 2021 .

[27]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  Sustainable Applications of Smart-Government Services: A Model to Understand Smart-Government Adoption , 2021, Sustainability.

[28]  C. Cheung,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological needs of tourists: implications for the travel and tourism industry , 2021 .

[29]  L. Božić,et al.  The digital divide and E-government in European economies , 2021, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[30]  Lijun Ma,et al.  Matching daily home health-care demands with supply in service-sharing platforms , 2020, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[31]  Guomin Zhang,et al.  Driving factors of total carbon emissions from the construction industry in Jiangsu Province, China , 2020 .

[32]  J. Xia,et al.  E-justice evaluation factors: The case of Smart Court of China , 2020, Information Development.

[33]  Indri Dwi Apriliyanti,et al.  Digital divide in ASEAN member states: analyzing the critical factors for successful e-government programs , 2020, Online Inf. Rev..

[34]  Meiyun Zuo,et al.  Inter-agency information sharing for Chinese e-government development: a comparison between vertical and horizontal dimensions , 2020, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[35]  K. Angelakoglou,et al.  The Nexus between Market Needs and Value Attributes of Smart City Solutions towards Energy Transition. An Empirical Evidence of Two European Union (EU) Smart Cities, Evora and Alkmaar , 2020, Smart Cities.

[36]  Rosario Pérez-Morote,et al.  The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries , 2020 .

[37]  Ling-dan Zeng,et al.  A study on the psychological needs of nurses caring for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 from the perspective of the existence, relatedness, and growth theory , 2020, International Journal of Nursing Sciences.

[38]  Yan Li,et al.  Service quality, perceived value, and citizens' continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Banghui Zhang,et al.  Comparing attitudes towards adoption of e-government between urban users and rural users: an empirical study in Chongqing municipality, China , 2020, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Liang Ma,et al.  Citizen engagement and co-production of e-government services in China , 2020 .

[41]  Ashok Sivaji,et al.  Validation of Early Testing Method for E-Government Projects by Requirement Engineering , 2019, 2019 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS).

[42]  Yonghan Zhu,et al.  Linking Smart Governance to Future Generations: A Study on the Use of Local E-Government Service among Undergraduate Students in a Chinese Municipality , 2019, Informatics.

[43]  Jennifer Rowley,et al.  User experience of e-government: the Nigeria Immigration Service , 2019, Libr. Hi Tech.

[44]  Liang Ma,et al.  National e-government performance and citizen satisfaction: a multilevel analysis across European countries , 2019 .

[45]  Yanqing Wang,et al.  Does sponge-style old community renewal lead to a satisfying life for residents? An investigation in Zhenjiang, China , 2019, Habitat International.

[46]  An Advanced Quick-Answering System Intended for the e-Government Service in the Republic of Serbia , 2019, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica.

[47]  Chang Zhu,et al.  Adult Learners' Needs in Online and Blended Learning. , 2019 .

[48]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  A framework for Internet of Things-enabled smart government: A case of IoT cybersecurity policies and use cases in U.S. federal government , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Karel Martens,et al.  The Dutch elderly's preferences toward a smart demand-responsive transport service , 2019, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[50]  Isaac Kofi Mensah.  Predictors of Electronic Government Services Adoption: The African Students’ Perspective in China , 2019, International Journal of Public Administration.

[51]  Steven Van de Walle,et al.  Explaining non-adoption of electronic government services by citizens: A study among non-users of public e-services in Latvia , 2018, Inf. Polity.

[52]  Fakhar Shahzad,et al.  An empirical investigation on the adoption of cryptocurrencies among the people of mainland China , 2018, Technology in Society.

[53]  Yun-long Ding,et al.  The Service Supply Effect of Cooperatives under Economic Transformation: A Demand-Supply Perspective , 2018, Sustainability.

[54]  Isaac Kofi Mensah,et al.  Factors Determining the Use of E-Government Services: An Empirical Study on Russian Students in China , 2018, Int. J. E Adopt..

[55]  Liang Ma.  Digital Divide and Citizen Use of E-Government in China's Municipalities , 2018, International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age.

[56]  Chenghan Ming,et al.  An Empirical Study of E-Service Quality and User Satisfaction of Public Service Centers in China , 2018, International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age.

[57]  Akram A. Moustafa,et al.  Exploring perceived risk, perceived trust, perceived quality and the innovative characteristics in the adoption of smart government services in Jordan , 2018, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[58]  B. Al-Jenaibi,et al.  Happiness, Morality, Rationality, and Challenges in Implementing Smart Government Policy , 2018 .

[59]  Francisco Javier Miranda González,et al.  Quality in e-Government services: A proposal of dimensions from the perspective of public sector employees , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[60]  Abel Suing,et al.  Orientación al ciudadano en el “gobierno electrónico” de los municipios de Ecuador , 2018 .

[61]  Yao Yang,et al.  Towards a New Digital Era: Observing Local E-Government Services Adoption in a Chinese Municipality , 2017, Future Internet.

[62]  Hsiaoping Yeh,et al.  The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens' perspectives , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[63]  S. J. Balla.  Is Consultation the “New Normal?”: Online Policymaking and Governance Reform in China , 2017 .

[64]  Domonic A. Bearfield,et al.  Can You Find It on the Web? An Assessment of Municipal E-Government Transparency , 2017 .

[65]  Jesper Schlæger,et al.  E-monitoring of public servants in China: higher quality of government? , 2017 .

[66]  Zied Elouedi,et al.  Proactive and reactive e-government services recommendation , 2015, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[67]  Bayu Hendradjaya,et al.  A proposal for quality assessment model for software requirements specification in Indonesian language for e-Government , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE).

[68]  Yu Dong,et al.  A comprehensive concept map for adequate protection and effective management of personal information in networked Chinese services , 2015, Electron. Libr..

[69]  S. J. Balla.  Health system reform and political participation on the Chinese Internet , 2014 .

[70]  Haitao Pu,et al.  Implementation of Traffic E-Government Cloud Technology for Department of Transportation , 2014 .

[71]  Sangin Park,et al.  Does better e-readiness induce more use of e-government? Evidence from the Korean central e-government , 2013 .

[72]  Roliana Ibrahim,et al.  Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: Acceptance in hedonic volitional context (Facebook) , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[73]  Muhammad Mustafa Kamal,et al.  Investigating Factors Inhibiting e-Government Adoption in Developing Countries: The Context of Pakistan , 2013, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[74]  Fang Zhao,et al.  Key issues and challenges in e-government development: An integrative case study of the number one eCity in the Arab World , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[75]  Cheng-Liang Yang,et al.  An empirical study of the existence, relatedness, and growth (ERG) theory in consumer's selection of mobile value-added services , 2011 .

[76]  Johannes M. Bauer,et al.  E-government in China: deployment and driving forces of provincial government portals , 2010 .

[77]  Robin Gauld,et al.  Do they want it? Do they use it? The 'Demand-Side' of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[78]  Biao He,et al.  SWOT analysis on National Common Geospatial Information Service Platform of China , 2009, International Symposium on Digital Earth.

[79]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing e-government implementation in China: A process perspective , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[80]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[81]  C. Alderfer.  An empirical test of a new theory of human needs , 1969 .

[82]  H. L. Moore.  A Moving Equilibrium of Demand and Supply , 1925 .

[83]  N. Rizun,et al.  Assessment of E-government inclusion policies toward seniors: A framework and case study , 2022, Telecommunications Policy.

[84]  Haibao Zhao.  The mechanism of knowledge seeking and sharing behaviors influenced by individual cognition and motivation of online health community users in China , 2022, Transinformação.

[85]  Fera Tri Hartanti,et al.  Citizens’ Trust Measurement in Smart Government Services , 2021, IEEE Access.

[86]  Maria Alexandra Cunha,et al.  Gendering the digital divide: The use of electronic government services and implications for the digital gender gap , 2021, Inf. Polity.

[87]  Kuno Schedler,et al.  How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government , 2019, Inf. Polity.

[88]  Pradita Maulidya Effendi,et al.  Test of Citizens’ Physical and Cognitive on Indonesian E-Government Website Design , 2019, Procedia Computer Science.

[89]  Gregory A. Porumbescu,et al.  Engendering inclusive e-government use through citizen IT training programs , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[90]  M. A. Burhanuddin,et al.  An Analysis of Cloud Computing Adoption Framework for Iraqi e-Government , 2018 .

[91]  Manuel Pérez Cota,et al.  From the quality of traditional services to the quality of local e-Government online services: A literature review , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[92]  Yuehua Wu,et al.  Protecting personal data in E-government: A cross-country study , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[93]  Xiaoyi Wang,et al.  Evaluating the readiness of government portal websites in China to adopt contemporary public administration principles , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..