Market forces and competition in university systems: theoretical reflections and empirical evidence from Italy

This paper deals with the reforming processes in higher education (HE) from centralised systems towards more competitive ones. In particular, I discuss these issues referring to the Italian case, and the market‐like mechanisms introduced in it during 1990s and early 2000s. The focus of the paper is in analysing the effects of the increasing competition on teaching performance of universities. For this purpose, I develop a theoretical model, moving from the framework of yardstick competition (YC), to describe the functioning of a competition model based on comparing performance of institutions. Then, I apply this model using data from the Italian university system. The results suggest that an increasingly competitive environment effectively improves the universities’ performance, which is also influenced by other factors, namely the characteristics of the institutions themselves and of their students, and by the resources available. As the exploratory nature of the study, these findings must be validated through future research.

[1]  Samuel R. Staley,et al.  Quality competition and public schools: Further evidence , 1995 .

[2]  Jim Taylor,et al.  The Effect of the Quasi-Market on the Efficiency-Equity Trade-Off in the Secondary School Sector , 2002 .

[3]  B. Jongbloed,et al.  Markets in Higher Education. Rhetoric or Reality , 2004 .

[4]  Geraint Johnes,et al.  The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Blair R. Zanzig.  Measuring the impact of competition in local government education markets on the cognitive achievement of students , 1997 .

[6]  C. Belfield.  Economic Principles for Education: Theory and Evidence , 2003 .

[7]  Robert Crouchley,et al.  Testing for Quasi-Market Forces in Secondary Education , 2000 .

[8]  J. Grand.  Quasi-markets and social policy , 1991 .

[9]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools , 1986 .

[10]  E. Cohn,et al.  Institutions of Higher Education as Multi-product Firms: Economies of Scale and Scope , 1989 .

[11]  James L. Jackson,et al.  International Handbook on the Economics of Education , 2008 .

[12]  C. Belfield.  The Effects of Competition on Educational Outcomes , 2003 .

[13]  D. Dill.  Higher education markets and public policy , 1997 .

[14]  A. M. Klemperer,et al.  Market type mechanisms in higher education : a comparative analysis of their occurrence and discussions on the issue in five higher education systems , 1999 .

[15]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies , 2002 .

[16]  Susan M. Gates,et al.  In Pursuit of Prestige: Strategy and Competition in U.S. Higher Education , 2001 .

[17]  Steve Bradley,et al.  The effect of spatial competition on secondary school exam performance , 1998 .

[18]  C. Hoxby.  How the Changing Market Structure of U.S. Higher Education Explains College Tuition , 1997 .

[19]  R. Ball,et al.  Performance indicators in higher education , 1987 .

[20]  G. Johnes,et al.  Never Give Up on the Good Times: Student Attrition in the UK , 2004 .

[21]  Thomas J. Nechyba,et al.  Mobility, Targeting, and Private-School Vouchers , 2000 .

[22]  M. Feldstein,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF GEOGRAPHIC INTEGRATION AND INCREASING COMPETITION IN THE MARKET FOR COLLEGE EDUCATION , 2000 .

[23]  R. F. Allen,et al.  Some new evidence of the character of competition among higher education institutions , 1999 .

[24]  J. Johnes.  Inter-university variations in undergraduate non-completion rates: A statistical analysis by subject of study , 1997 .

[25]  Tommaso Agasisti,et al.  Data envelopment analysis to the Italian university system: theoretical issues and policy implications , 2006 .

[26]  G. Bramley.  Quasi-markets and social policy , 1993 .

[27]  G. Glomm,et al.  On the political economy of means-tested education vouchers , 2000 .

[28]  D. Dill.  Allowing the Market to Rule: The Case of the United States , 2003 .

[29]  Tommaso Agasisti,et al.  Governance models of university systems—towards quasi‐markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison , 2006 .

[30]  The Productivity of Schools and Other Local Public Goods Providers , 1999 .

[31]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the cost structure of Higher Education in England , 2005 .

[32]  G. Johnes.  Standards and Grade Inflation , 2004 .

[33]  Verica Vašiček,et al.  Performance Indicators in Higher Education , 2007 .

[34]  Mark Bagnoli,et al.  Center for Research on Economic and Social Theory CREST Working Paper Carrot and Yardstick Regulation : Enhancing Market Performance with Output Prizes , 2013 .

[35]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Theory of Yardstick Competition , 1985 .

[36]  Eshien Chong,et al.  Yardstick competition vs . individual incentive regulation : What has the theoretical literature to say ? , 2004 .