Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors.

Emerging cancer therapeutics target the immune system, stimulating host antitumor response. Tumor cells generate an immunosuppressive milieu with multiple mechanisms to evade immune destruction, including disruption of effective antigen presentation, reduction of effector T-cell function, and upregulation of pathways that promote tolerance and T-cell anergy.1 The programmed death (PD) -1/PD ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway is a critical component of tumor-mediated immunosuppression. Antibodies to PD-1 and PD-L1 have shown potential clinical benefit in advanced solid tumors.2 The US Food and Drug Administration approved the PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab for metastatic melanoma and also recently approved nivolumab for the treatment of metastatic squamous non–small-cell lung cancer. The US Food and Drug Administration has also designated the PD-L1 inhibitor MPDL3280A as a breakthrough therapy for bladder cancer and non–small-cell lung cancer. These drugs and additional immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently under investigation in multiple clinical trials as single-agent therapy and also in combination with other agents.

[1]  A. Fojo,et al.  Why RECIST works and why it should stay--counterpoint. , 2012, Cancer research.

[2]  Drew M. Pardoll,et al.  The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[3]  C. Drake,et al.  Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  G. Linette,et al.  Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  Israel Lowy,et al.  Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors: Immune-Related Response Criteria , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  C. Horak,et al.  Safety, efficacy, and biomarkers of nivolumab with vaccine in ipilimumab-refractory or -naive melanoma. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Motzer,et al.  Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Maio,et al.  Therapeutic efficacy of ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, in patients with metastatic melanoma unresponsive to prior systemic treatments: clinical and immunological evidence from three patient cases , 2009, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[10]  J. Taube,et al.  Long-term survival of ipilimumab-naive patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in a phase I trial. , 2014 .

[11]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[12]  R. Schreiber,et al.  Cancer Immunoediting: Integrating Immunity’s Roles in Cancer Suppression and Promotion , 2011, Science.

[13]  David C. Smith,et al.  Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  F. Cappuzzo,et al.  Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): a phase 2, single-arm trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  P. Hegde,et al.  MPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer , 2014, Nature.

[17]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[19]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Evaluation of immune-related response criteria (irRC) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody MK-3475. , 2014 .

[20]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  David C. Smith,et al.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  C. Horak,et al.  Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  H. Kohrt,et al.  Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients , 2014, Nature.