Developer effect on the negative tone development process under low NILS conditions

The effect of solvent developers on the negative tone development process was studied in both dry and immersion 193 nm lithography. While acetate-based solvent developers yielded sharp thickness contrasts with a minimum resist thickness loss, severe missing contact holes were observed under lower image-log slope conditions. In contrast, ketone-based solvent developers yielded excellent contact hole performance under poor aerial image conditions without the formation of missing contact holes. However, it was observed that ketone-based solvent developers can cause poor thickness contrasts with more resist thickness loss. By using additives in the ketone-based developers, it was possible to tailor various resist performance parameters such as photospeeds, critical dimension uniformity, resist thickness retention, and dissolution rate contrasts. It was found that higher dissolution rate contrast can give better uniformity in the critical dimension, better thickness retention and less missing contact holes.

[1]  James W. Thackeray,et al.  Deep UV ANR Photoresists For 248 nm Excimer Laser Photolithography , 1989, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  James W. Thackeray,et al.  Dissolution inhibition mechanism of ANR photoresists: crosslinking vs. -OH site consumption , 1991, Other Conferences.

[3]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Fundamental differences between positive- and negative-tone imaging , 1992, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  C. Zhang,et al.  Relief and Functional Photoimaging with Chemically Amplified Resists Based on Di-tert-Butyl Butenedioate-co-Styrene , 1995 .

[5]  Takeo Hashimoto,et al.  Comparison between optical proximity effect of positive and negative tone patterns in KrF lithography , 1997, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  M. Asano Sub-100 nm Lithography with KrF Exposure Using Multiple Development Method , 1999 .

[7]  Takeshi Iwai,et al.  Chemically amplified negative-tone resist using novel acryl polymer for 193-nm lithography , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Jeff D. Byers,et al.  Negative-tone 193-nm resists , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Will Conley,et al.  Dual damascene photo process using negative-tone resist , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Lon A. Wang,et al.  Negative-tone cycloolefin photoresist for 193-nm lithography , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Carlos Fonseca,et al.  Optimum tone for various feature types: positive versus negative , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Harry J. Levinson,et al.  Principles of Lithography , 2001 .

[13]  P. Hewitt,et al.  Positive Versus Negative Perfectionism in Psychopathology , 2006, Behavior modification.

[14]  Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.  Development of materials and processes for double patterning toward 32- nm node 193- nm immersion lithography process , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Mireille Maenhoudt,et al.  Ultimate contact hole resolution using immersion lithography with line/space imaging , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Y. Bae,et al.  Sub 30nm Node Contact Hole Patterning Using Immersion Single Exposure with Negative Tone Development , 2010 .

[17]  Geert Vandenberghe,et al.  Comparing positive and negative tone development process for printing the metal and contact layers of the 32- and 22-nm nodes , 2010 .