Performance grading and motivational functioning and fear in physical education : A self-determination theory perspective

Grounded in self-determination theory, the present study examines the explanatory role of students' perceived need satisfaction and need frustration in the relationship between performance grading (versus non-grading) and students' motivation and fear in a real-life educational physical education setting. Grading consisted of teacher judgments of students' performances through observations, based on pre-defined assessment criteria. Thirty-one classes with 409 students (Mage = 14.7) from twenty-seven Flemish (Belgian) secondary schools completed questionnaires measuring students' perceived motivation, fear and psychological need satisfaction and frustration, after two lessons: one with and one without performance grading. After lessons including performance grading, students reported less intrinsic motivation and identified regulation, and more external regulation, amotivation and fear. As expected, less need satisfaction accounted for (i.e., mediated) the relationship between performance grading and self-determined motivational outcomes. Need frustration explained the relationship between performance grading and intrinsic motivation, as well as less self-determined motivational outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[2]  Lars Borghouts,et al.  Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[3]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[4]  R. Ryan,et al.  Legislating competence: High-stakes testing policies and their relations with psychological theories and research , 2005 .

[5]  H. Marsh,et al.  Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. , 2010, The British journal of educational psychology.

[6]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. , 2011 .

[7]  R. Ryan,et al.  Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: assessing the darker side of athletic experience. , 2011, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[9]  P. Tunstall,et al.  Teacher Feedback to Young Children in Formative Assessment: a typology , 1996 .

[10]  J. Reeve,et al.  Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model , 2016 .

[11]  Arlen C. Moller,et al.  Performance-approach goals: good or bad forms of regulation? , 2003 .

[12]  Brett D. Jones.  The Unintended Outcomes of High-Stakes Testing , 2007, High Stakes Testing: New Challenges and Opportunities for School Psychology.

[13]  Viera Kerpanova,et al.  Physical Education and Sport at School in Europe. , 2013 .

[14]  M. Vansteenkiste,et al.  Chinese Education Examined via the Lens of Self-Determination , 2018 .

[15]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[16]  F. Butera,et al.  Autonomy and task performance: Explaining the impact of grades on intrinsic motivation. , 2013 .

[17]  N. Ntoumanis,et al.  A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[18]  P. Hay,et al.  Student views on criterion-referenced assessment and grading in Swedish physical education , 2012 .

[19]  R. Ryan,et al.  Autonomy in children's learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Angus S. McDonald,et al.  The Prevalence and Effects of Test Anxiety in School Children , 2001, DECP Debate.

[21]  J. Reeve,et al.  Enhancing Students' Engagement by Increasing Teachers' Autonomy Support , 2004 .

[22]  Richard M. Ryan,et al.  Undermining quality teaching and learning , 2009 .

[23]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Alternative assessment in physical education: a review of international literature , 2013 .

[24]  Nathalie Aelterman,et al.  Students' objectively measured physical activity levels and engagement as a function of between-class and between-student differences in motivation toward physical education. , 2012, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[25]  Keven A. Prusak,et al.  The Effects of the Type of Skill Test, Choice, and Gender on the Situational Motivation of Physical Education Students , 2011 .

[26]  M. Strain.  The Education Reform Act 1988 , 2009 .

[27]  Nathalie Aelterman,et al.  Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation , 2015 .

[28]  F. Butera,et al.  Why Grades Engender Performance Avoidance Goals: The Mediating Role of Autonomous Motivation , 2011 .

[29]  S. Dutke,et al.  Metacognitive monitoring in university classes: anticipating a graded vs. a pass-fail test affects monitoring accuracy , 2013 .

[30]  D. Berliner,et al.  High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning , 2002 .

[31]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[32]  Martyn Standage,et al.  Motivation in physical education classes , 2009 .

[33]  A. Elliot,et al.  Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Tomas Jungert,et al.  A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: the unique role of intrinsic motivation , 2014 .

[35]  B. Lingard.  Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling , 2010 .

[36]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-Determination Theory and the Explanatory Role of Psychological Needs in Human Well-being , 2008 .

[37]  D. Macdonald,et al.  (Mis)appropriations of criteria and standards‐referenced assessment in a performance‐based subject , 2008 .

[38]  Richard M. Ryan,et al.  On Psychological Growth and Vulnerability: Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration as a Unifying Principle , 2013 .

[39]  Kim C. Graber,et al.  Perceptions of overweight students concerning their experiences in physical education. , 2009 .

[40]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures , 2015 .

[41]  Georgios Sideridis,et al.  The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: evidence for a motivational model. , 2008, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[42]  E. Cerin,et al.  A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity , 2009, Public Health Nutrition.

[43]  Christopher P. Niemiec,et al.  Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom , 2009 .

[44]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation , 2006 .

[45]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[46]  Nathalie Aelterman,et al.  Does observed controlling teaching behavior relate to students’ motivation in physical education? , 2014 .

[47]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  ‘I have my own picture of what the demands are ... ’: Grading in Swedish PEH — problems of validity, comparability and fairness , 2010 .

[48]  Jane Meckbach,et al.  Exploring PE teachers’ ‘gut feelings’ , 2014 .

[49]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts , 2004 .

[50]  J. Hox.  Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications, 2nd ed. , 2010 .

[51]  D. Koretz.  Testing and Diversity in Postsecondary Education: The Case of California , 2002 .

[52]  D. Putwain,et al.  Fear Appeals in the Primary Classroom: Effects on Test Anxiety and Test Grade. , 2011 .

[53]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[54]  P. Hay,et al.  Understanding the pedagogic discourse of assessment in Physical Education , 2011 .

[55]  Richard M. Ryan,et al.  Self-Determination Theory and Diminished Functioning , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  Ruth Butler,et al.  Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance , 1986 .

[57]  M. Vansteenkiste,et al.  Evaluative concerns perfectionism and coping with failure : effects on rumination, avoidance, and acceptance , 2016 .

[58]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  The effect of experimental manipulation of student motivation on the situational representation of text , 2007 .

[59]  R. Butler.  Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. , 1987 .

[60]  P. Newton.  Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment , 2007 .