Theoretical Principles in Interurban Simulation Models: A Comparison

Agent-based models are increasingly used by urban specialists, supplanting the simulation models using differential equations which were more popular earlier. These models already made reference to the theories of self-organisation and to mechanisms of evolution not so far from those used today to describe the emergence of macroscopic properties or structures in a bottom-up process from interactions operating at the microlevel. Moreover there is less difference than often suggested in the literature between the two forms of modelling – differential equations and multi-agent models—in the way they integrate principles of urban theory. To test this assumption, we compare models made of systems of differential equations (Allen's model firmly rooted in self-organisation theory and the model developed by Weidlich and Haag, affiliated to synergetic theory) with multi-agent models (SIMPOP family) designed to meet the same task: Simulating the differentiated dynamics of urban entities over the medium to long term from their functional economic specialisation. We show that multi-agent systems are providing interesting solutions for the modelling method, because of their greater ability to simulate the emergence of geographical macrostructures from different levels of interaction.

[1]  S. Albeverio,et al.  Fifty Years of Urban Modelling : Macro Statics to Micro Dynamics , in , 2007 .

[2]  Tom De Wolf,et al.  Emergence Versus Self-Organisation: Different Concepts but Promising When Combined , 2004, Engineering Self-Organising Systems.

[3]  Denise Pumain,et al.  The Socio-Spatial Dynamics of Systems of Cities and Innovation Processes: a Multi-Level Model , 2008 .

[4]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Vers une modélisation de la dynamique intra urbaine , 1984 .

[5]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Multiagent Systems and the Dynamics of a Settlement System , 2010 .

[6]  Brian J. L. Berry,et al.  Geography of Market Centers and Retail Distribution , 1967 .

[7]  A. Faludi,et al.  Cities and complexity: , 2021, Cities in the Anthropocene.

[8]  Alison J. Heppenstall,et al.  Extending Spatial Interaction Models with Agents for Understanding Relationships in a Dynamic Retail Market , 2011 .

[9]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[10]  Jacques Ferber,et al.  Multi-agent systems - an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence , 1999 .

[11]  Michael Batty,et al.  Fifty Years of Urban Modeling: Macro-Statics to Micro-Dynamics , 2008 .

[12]  Léna Sanders Objets géographiques et simulation agent, entre thématique et méthodologie , 2007, Rev. Int. Géomatique.

[13]  Sonia Chardonnel,et al.  Simulating the swarm city : a MAS approach , 2005 .

[14]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[15]  É. Daudé,et al.  Comparison of three implementations of Schelling's spatial segregation model , 2007 .

[16]  M. Wegener Operational Urban Models State of the Art , 1994 .

[17]  A. Venables,et al.  The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade , 1999 .

[18]  Denise Pumain,et al.  The Future of Urban Systems: Exploratory Models , 2009 .

[19]  D. Pumain,et al.  Simulating Urban Networks through Multiscalar Space-Time Dynamics: Europe and the United States, 17th-20th Centuries , 2010 .

[20]  I. Benenson,et al.  Entity-Based Modeling of Urban Residential Dynamics: The Case of Yaffo, Tel Aviv , 2002 .

[21]  D. Pumain Alternative Explanations of Hierarchical Differentiation in Urban Systems , 2006 .

[22]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[23]  J. Portugali Toward a Cognitive Approach to Urban Dynamics , 2004 .

[24]  Peter Haggett,et al.  The Spatial Economy , 1978 .

[25]  Andrew Crooks,et al.  Agent-based Models of Geographical Systems , 2012 .

[26]  D. Dendrinos,et al.  Urban evolution : studies in the mathematical ecology of cities , 1985 .

[27]  Denise Pumain Commentary: Plea for the Experimentation and Comparison of Dynamic Models , 1991 .

[28]  Hélène Mathian,et al.  SIMPOP: A Multiagent System for the Study of Urbanism , 1997 .

[29]  M. Batty Polynucleated Urban Landscapes , 2001 .

[30]  P. Torrens,et al.  Geosimulation: Automata-based modeling of urban phenomena , 2004 .

[31]  Alan Wilson,et al.  Catastrophe Theory and Bifurcation : Applications to Urban and Regional Systems , 1980 .

[32]  P. Allen Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Models of Complexity , 1997 .

[33]  G Haag,et al.  Interurban Migration and the Dynamics of a System of Cities: 1. The Stochastic Framework with an Application to the French Urban System , 1992, Environment & planning A.

[34]  R. White,et al.  MODELING LAND USE CHANGE WITH LINKED CELLULAR AUTOMATA AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC MODELS: A Tool for Exploring the Impact of Climate Change on the Island of St. Lucia , 2001 .

[35]  Michael Batty,et al.  Modeling Complexity : The Limits to Prediction , 2001 .

[36]  D. Pumain Pour une théorie évolutive des villes , 1997 .

[37]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Nonreductive Individualism , 2002 .

[38]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Villes et auto-organisation , 1989 .

[39]  Joana Barros,et al.  Simulating urban dynamics in Latin American cities , 2004 .

[40]  P. M. Allen,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Growth in a Central Place System , 2010 .

[41]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Urban Research and Complexity , 1998 .