Chinese kindergartners’ automatic processing of numerical magnitude in Stroop-like tasks

Using Stroop-like tasks, this study examined whether Chinese kindergartners showed automatic processing of numerical magnitude. A total of 36 children (mean age 5 5 years 10 months) were asked to perform physical size comparison (i.e., “Which of two numbers is bigger in physical size?”) and numerical magnitude tasks (i.e., “Which of two numbers is bigger in numerical magnitude?”) on 216 number pairs. These number pairs varied in levels of congruence between numerical magnitude and physical size (for Stroop effect) and numerical distance (for distance effect). On the basis of analyses of response time and error rates, we found that Chinese kindergartners showed automatic processing of numerical magnitude. These results are significantly different from previous studies’ findings about the onset age (ranging from around the end of first grade to third grade) for automatic processing of numerical magnitude.

[1]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  The Development of Ordinal Numerical Competence in Young Children , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  E. M. Duncan,et al.  Isolating the effects of symbolic distance, and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factors analysis , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children: ten years later. , 1993, Science.

[5]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Cross-Linguistic Differences in Digit Span of Preschool Children , 1988 .

[6]  L Girelli,et al.  The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Karen C. Fuson,et al.  Children's Knowledge of Teen Quantities as Tens and Ones; Comparisons of Chinese, British, and American Kindergartners. , 1998 .

[9]  D M Rumbaugh,et al.  Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Numerical Reasoning in Young Children: The Ordering Principle. , 1977 .

[11]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information , 1992 .

[12]  H. Stevenson,et al.  Motivation and mathematics achievement: a comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and east Asian high school students. , 1995, Child development.

[13]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  E. Cannon,et al.  Preschoolers' Magnitude Comparisons are Mediated by a Preverbal Analog Mechanism , 2000, Psychological science.

[15]  K. Miller,et al.  Preschool Origins of Cross-National Differences in Mathematical Competence: The Role of Number-Naming Systems , 1995 .

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[17]  H. Heinze,et al.  On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: a behavioral and event-related potential study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  W. Fias.  The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[19]  Laurence Rousselle,et al.  Magnitude representation in children: Its development and dysfunction , 2005 .

[20]  H W Stevenson,et al.  Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. , 1990, Child development.

[21]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Learning Mathematics in China and the United States: Cross-Cultural Insights into the Nature and Course of Preschool Mathematical Development , 2005 .

[22]  K F Miller,et al.  When days are numbered: calendar structure and the development of calendar processing in English and Chinese. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. , 2001 .

[24]  S Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  James W. Stigler,et al.  Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited store , 1986, Cognition.

[26]  A. Henik,et al.  Unintentional word reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross-script homophones. , 1996 .

[27]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  The Development of numerical competence : animal and human models , 1993 .

[28]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[29]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  The Mathematical Brain , 1999 .

[30]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[32]  P. Jose,et al.  Cultural Differences in Early Mathematics Learning: A Comparison of Euro-American, Chinese-American, and Taiwan-Chinese Families , 1997 .

[33]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[34]  Derek Besner,et al.  Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  Steven J. Chrostowski,et al.  TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. , 2004 .

[37]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[38]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.