Assessment of Elk Highway Permeability by Using Global Positioning System Telemetry

Abstract Highways have significant direct and indirect impact on natural ecosystems, including wildlife barrier and fragmentation effects, resulting in diminished habitat connectivity and highway permeability. We used Global Positioning System (GPS) telemetry to assess Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) permeability across a 30-km stretch of highway in central Arizona, USA, currently being reconstructed with 11 wildlife underpasses, 6 bridges, and associated ungulate-proof fencing. The highway was reconstructed in phases, allowing for comparison of highway crossing and passage rates during various stages of reconstruction. We instrumented 33 elk (25 F, 8 M) with GPS receiver collars May 2002 to April 2004. Our collars accrued 101,506 GPS fixes with 45% occurring within 1 km of the highway. Nearly 2 times the proportion of fixes occurred within 1 km of the highway compared with random. We think elk were attracted to the highway corridor by riparian–meadow foraging habitats that were 7 times more concentrated within the 1-km zone around the highway compared with the mean proportion within elk use areas encompassing all GPS fixes. Elk crossed the highway 3,057 times; crossing frequency and distribution along the highway were aggregated compared with random. Crossing frequency within 0.16-km highway segments was negatively associated with the distance to riparian–meadow habitats (rs = −0.714, n = 190, P < 0.001). Mean observed crossing frequency (92.6 ± 23.5 [SE] crossings/elk) was lower than random (149.6 ± 27.6 crossings/elk). Females crossed 4.5 times as frequently as males. Highway permeability among reconstruction classes was assessed using passage rates (ratio of highway crossings to approaches); our overall mean passage rate was 0.67 ± 0.08 crossings per approach. The mean passage rate for elk crossing the highway section where reconstruction was completed (0.43 ± 0.15 crossings/approach) was half that of sections under reconstruction and control sections combined (0.86 ± 0.09 crossings/approach). Permeability was jointly influenced by the size of the widened highway and associated vehicular traffic on all lanes. Crossing frequency was used to delineate where ungulate-proof fencing yielded maximum benefit in intercepting and funneling crossing elk toward underpasses, promoting highway safety. Use of passage rates provides a quantitative measure to assess permeability, conduct future pre- and postconstruction comparisons, and to develop mitigation strategies to minimize highway impacts to wildlife.

[1]  Rob Roy Ramey,et al.  Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep , 2005 .

[2]  Norris L. Dodd,et al.  Characteristics of Elk-Vehicle Collisions and Comparison to GPS-Determined Highway Crossing Patterns , 2005 .

[3]  Katharina Tluk von Toschanowitz,et al.  Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: An interactive model of road avoidance behavior , 2005 .

[4]  J. S. Waller,et al.  EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE ON GRIZZLY BEARS IN NORTHWESTERN MONTANA , 2005 .

[5]  Karin R. McCoy.  Effects of transportation and development on black bear movement, mortality, and use of the Highway 93 corridor in NW Montana , 2005 .

[6]  Dean P. Anderson,et al.  SCALE-DEPENDENT SUMMER RESOURCE SELECTION BY REINTRODUCED ELK IN WISCONSIN, USA , 2005 .

[7]  Raymond M. Sauvajot,et al.  Use of highway undercrossings by wildlife in southern California , 2004 .

[8]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Long-term, year-round monitoring of wildlife crossing structures and the importance of temporal and spatial variability in performance studies , 2003 .

[9]  Christopher Servheen,et al.  A SAMPLING OF WILDLIFE USE IN RELATION TO STRUCTURE VARIABLES FOR BRIDGES AND CULVERTS UNDER I-90 BETWEEN ALBERTON AND ST. REGIS, MONTANA , 2003 .

[10]  L. Fahrig,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TRAFFIC VOLUME ON TRANSLOCATED SMALL MAMMAL MOVEMENT , 2003 .

[11]  Charles R. Anderson,et al.  Estimating cougar predation rates from GPS location clusters , 2003 .

[12]  R. Schaefer,et al.  Performance of two GPS telemetry collars under different habitat conditions , 2003 .

[13]  Julia A. Jones,et al.  Road Ecology: Science and Solutions , 2002 .

[14]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta , 2002 .

[15]  Patrick Tracy McGowen,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR UNGULATE-VEHICLE COLLISION MITIGATION , 2002 .

[16]  Christopher O. Kochanny,et al.  GPS radiotelemetry error and bias in mountainous terrain , 2002 .

[17]  K. Schwabe,et al.  Deer-Vehicle Collisions and Deer Value: An Analysis of Competing Literatures , 2002 .

[18]  John F. Lehmkuhl,et al.  Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: a geographic information system weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment. , 2002 .

[19]  Anthony P. Clevenger,et al.  Effects of Highways on Grizzly Bear Movement in the Bow River Watershed, Alberta, Canada , 2001 .

[20]  L. Scott Mills,et al.  DO HIGHWAYS FRAGMENT SMALL MAMMAL POPULATIONS , 2001 .

[21]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Avoidance of Industrial Development by Woodland Caribou , 2001 .

[22]  Anthony P. Clevenger,et al.  Highway mitigation fencing reduces wildlife-vehicle collisions , 2001 .

[23]  G. Gerlach,et al.  Fragmentation of Landscape as a Cause for Genetic Subdivision in Bank Voles , 2000 .

[24]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Elk Distribution and Modeling in Relation to Roads , 2000 .

[25]  R. Forman,et al.  Estimate of the Area Affected Ecologically by the Road System in the United States , 2000 .

[26]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[27]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[28]  C. Callahan,et al.  EFFECTS OF LINEAR DEVELOPMENTS ON WINTER MOVEMENTS OF GRAY WOLVES IN THE BOW RIVER VALLEY OF BANFF NATIONAL PARK, ALBERTA , 1996 .

[29]  E. Hazebroek,et al.  Ungulate Traffic Collisions in Europe , 1996 .

[30]  Laura A. Romin,et al.  Deer-Vehicle Collisions: Nationwide Status of State Monitoring Activities and Efforts , 1996 .

[31]  Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A GPS ANIMAL LOCATION SYSTEM UNDER BOREAL FOREST CANOPY , 1995 .

[32]  P. Beier.  Dispersal of juvenile cougars in fragmented habitat , 1995 .

[33]  Humphrey,et al.  Use of Highway Underpasses by Florida Panthers and Other Wildlife , 1995 .

[34]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting And Restoring Biodiversity , 1994 .

[35]  G. Witmer,et al.  Effect of Forest Roads on Habitat Use by Roosevelt Elk , 1985 .

[36]  N. Slade,et al.  Road Crossing in Sigmodon hispidus and Microtus ochrogaster , 1984 .

[37]  J. Nelson,et al.  Nutritional requirements and food habits , 1982 .

[38]  Df Reed,et al.  Methods of Reducing Deer-Vehicle Accidents: Benefit-Cost Analysis , 1982 .

[39]  J. Bailey,et al.  Distribution of Mule Deer and Elk in Relation to Roads , 1979 .