Connect the dots: Accessibility, readability and site ranking - An investigation with reference to top ranked websites of Government of India

Abstract With the emergence of World Wide Web (WWW) as the primary reference channel of information, the need for making it barrier-free for all categories of users has evolved into a critical factor. Making the web resources barrier-free for users requires action across various dimensions such as accessibility and readability. This paper presents an analysis of accessibility, readability, and site-ranking of top ranked (N = 20) government websites of India. The accessibility analysis has been carried out using aChecker and WAVE tools. The readability of the contents of the website is measured with six different indices such as Flesch-Kincaid reading ease, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning fog, SMOG, Coleman-Liau index and Automated Readability Index. The ranking of sites by National Informatics Centre (NIC) has been utilized to select the top ranked websites and their corresponding rankings are compared with global site ranking services such as Alexa. The correlation among these three factors of accessibility, readability, and site-ranking has been carried out with Spearman’s rank correlation method and the inferences derived from the results are presented.

[1]  Bertram Bruce Why Readability Formulas Fail. Reading Education Report No. 28. , 1981 .

[2]  Tomas Persson,et al.  The Language of Science and Readability. Correlations between Linguistic Features in TIMSS Science Items and the Performance of Different Groups of Swedish 8th Grade Students. , 2016 .

[3]  Mahmoud El-Haj,et al.  OSMAN ― A Novel Arabic Readability Metric , 2016, LREC.

[4]  William H. DuBay Smart Language: Readers, Readability, and the Grading of Text , 2007 .

[5]  K. S. Kuppusamy,et al.  Accessibility of Indian universities' homepages: An exploratory study , 2016, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci..

[6]  S. Sabharwal,et al.  Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Materials From Subspecialty Organization and Spine Practitioner Websites , 2009, Spine.

[7]  Christian Bühler,et al.  Towards Techniques for Easy-to-Read Web Content , 2013, DSAI.

[8]  David Kauchak,et al.  Moving Beyond Readability Metrics for Health-Related Text Simplification , 2016, IT Professional.

[9]  Bradford R. Connatser Last Rites for Readability Formulas in Technical Communication , 1999 .

[10]  S. Howard,et al.  Availability and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Regarding Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Perioperative Pain Management , 2016, Pain medicine.

[11]  Steve Drew,et al.  An evaluation of the accessibility of top-ranking university websites: Accessibility rates from 2005 to 2015 , 2017, Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning.

[12]  Rosli Mohamad,et al.  Web accessibility of the Malaysian public university websites , 2015 .

[13]  Kathleen M. Sheehan,et al.  A Review of Evidence Presented in Support of Three Key Claims in the Validity Argument for the "TextEvaluator"® Text Analysis Tool. Research Report. ETS RR-16-12. , 2016 .

[14]  Anthony V. Manzo Readability: A Postscript. , 1970 .

[15]  Satoshi Sato,et al.  Automatic Assessment of Japanese Text Readability Based on a Textbook Corpus , 2008, LREC.

[16]  Maja Popović,et al.  Machine translation evaluation metrics for quality assessment of automatically simplified sentences , 2016 .

[17]  Kevyn Collins-Thompson,et al.  Computational Assessment of Text Readability: A Survey of Current and Future Research Running title: Computational Assessment of Text Readability , 2014 .

[18]  J. Eloy,et al.  Readability analysis of healthcare‐oriented education resources from the american academy of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[19]  Takahiro Yamasaki,et al.  A Method of Readability Assessment for Web Documents Using Text Features and HTML Structures , 2014 .

[20]  Andreas Savva,et al.  Beyond Web Content Accessibility Guidelines: Expert Accessibility Reviews , 2016, DSAI.

[21]  S. Goel,et al.  Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines , 2016, Advances in preventive medicine.

[22]  B L Muralidhara,et al.  Government Websites of Kerala: An Evaluation using Government of India Guidelines , 2016 .

[23]  Anupam Basu,et al.  A study of readability of texts in Bangla through machine learning approaches , 2014, Education and Information Technologies.

[24]  Evelyn Eika,et al.  Universally Designed Text on the Web: Towards Readability Criteria Based on Anti-Patterns. , 2016, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[25]  William H. DuBay Unlocking Language: The Classic Readability Studies , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.