A new concept: the use of neutrally-buoyant microemulsions for DNAPL remediation

Even in the absence of mobilization of dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL), the microemulsion that forms when the surfactant solubilizes a dense contaminant such as trichloroethylene will be more dense than water and tends to migrate downward. This paper addresses the issue of migration with a new concept: surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation at neutral buoyancy. Laboratory results of surfactant remediation in two-dimensional model aquifers show that downward migration of microemulsion containing solubilized dense contaminants can be reduced to an acceptable level, even in the absence of capillary barriers in the aquifer. One model experiment was designed to exhibit a small degree of vertical migration and full capture of the microemulsion at the extraction well. The second experiment was designed to demonstrate the effect of large buoyancy forces that lead to excessive downward migration of the microemulsion. Density measurements of aqueous solutions containing sodium dihexyl sulfosuccinate surfactant, isopropanol, trichloroethylene, and sodium chloride are presented. A companion paper presents the results of the flow and transport calculations needed for this approach to surfactant flooding.

[1]  K. Raney,et al.  Soil Clean Up by in-situ Surfactant Flushing. III. Laboratory Results , 1989 .

[2]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Partitioning Tracer Test for Detection, Estimation, and Remediation Performance Assessment of Subsurface Nonaqueous Phase Liquids , 1995 .

[3]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Surfactant enhanced remediation of soil columns contaminated by residual tetrachloroethylene , 1994 .

[4]  R. S. Schechter,et al.  Microemulsions and related systems : formulation, solvency, and physical properties , 1988 .

[5]  Craig Taylor,et al.  A Controlled Field Test of Surfactant‐Enhanced Aquifer Remediation , 1996 .

[6]  L. Lake,et al.  Enhanced Oil Recovery , 2017 .

[7]  M. Baviere,et al.  Basic concepts in enhanced oil recovery processes , 1991 .

[8]  Pope Ga,et al.  Lessons from enhanced oil recovery research for surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation. , 1995 .

[9]  T. Gibson,et al.  Selection of Surfactants for the Removal of Petroleum Products from Shallow Sandy Aquifers , 1990 .

[10]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Anionic surfactant remediation of soil columns contaminated by nonaqueous phase liquids , 1999 .

[11]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Influence of Viscous and Buoyancy Forces on the Mobilization of Residual Tetrachloroethylene during Surfactant Flushing , 1996 .

[12]  Clarence A. Miller,et al.  Surfactant/Foam Process for Aquifer Remediation , 1997 .

[13]  G. Michael Shook,et al.  Prediction and minimization of vertical migration of DNAPLS using surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation at neutral buoyancy , 1998 .

[14]  J. Jawitz,et al.  Field Implementation of a Winsor Type I Surfactant/Alcohol Mixture for in Situ Solubilization of a Complex LNAPL as a Single-Phase Microemulsion , 1998 .

[15]  Joseph D. Rouse,et al.  Surfactant Selection for Optimizing Surfactant-Enhanced Subsurface Remediation , 1995 .

[16]  John A. Cherry,et al.  Dense Chlorinated Solvents and other DNAPLs in Groundwater , 1996 .

[17]  Kenneth Stuart Sorbie,et al.  Polymer-improved oil recovery , 1991 .

[18]  Chun Huh,et al.  Interfacial tensions and solubilizing ability of a microemulsion phase that coexists with oil and brine , 1979 .

[19]  P. Gélinas,et al.  Surfactant Solutions Developed for NAPL Recovery in Contaminated Aquifers , 1996 .