Sex and sex dissimilarity effects in ongoing teams: Some surprising findings

This study examined the effects of sex and sex dissimilarity on the task and social experiences of members of ongoing teams of management students. We hypothesized that women would have lower levels of social exchange, and ultimately, lower levels of attachment to their groups than would men, and that there would be no sex differences in task exchanges or task contributions. Sex dissimilarity between individuals and their teams was expected to impair individuals’ experiences. As predicted, women had lower social exchanges than men. There were no sex differences in attachment. Surprisingly, women had higher task exchanges and made greater task contributions. Sex dissimilarity had no effect on the experiences of men or women. Overall, women seemed to do more work or better work, but receive less social support, than did men.

[1]  C. M. Riordan,et al.  Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions , 2000 .

[2]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[3]  Prithviraj Chattopadhyay,et al.  Beyond Direct and Symmetrical Effects: The Influence of Demographic Dissimilarity on Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 1999 .

[4]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[5]  Mary Anne Devanna Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[6]  Thomas Eckes,et al.  The developmental social psychology of gender , 2000 .

[7]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams , 2001 .

[8]  Hall,et al.  Sex, Task, and Behavioral Flexibility Effects on Leadership Perceptions. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[9]  Anson Seers,et al.  Team-member exchange quality: a new construct for role-making research , 1989 .

[10]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[11]  Carol Watson,et al.  The Role of Task-Related Behavior in the Emergence of Leaders , 2004 .

[12]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[13]  C. Dwyer,et al.  Grades, accomplishments, and correlates. , 1997 .

[14]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts , 1997 .

[15]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Team Work and Group Dynamics , 1998 .

[16]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. , 1969 .

[17]  J. Hackman Group influences on individuals in organizations. , 1992 .

[18]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings. , 1991 .

[19]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[20]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[21]  E. Higgins,et al.  Pragmatic use of stereotyping in teamwork: social loafing and compensation as a function of inferred partner-situation fit. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[23]  Lisa Hope Pelled RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND PERCEPTIONS OF GROUP CONFLICT AND PERFORMANCE: A FIELD INVESTIGATION , 1996 .

[24]  P. Nick Blanchard,et al.  Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. , 1982 .

[25]  L. Karakowsky,et al.  The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  S. Schneider,et al.  Experiencing Diversity, Conflict, and Emotions in Teams , 2003 .

[28]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Use transnational teams to globalize your company , 1996 .

[29]  H. Ibarra Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework , 1993 .

[30]  C. Schneier,et al.  Role of sex, gender roles, and attraction in predicting emergent leaders. , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  K. Deaux,et al.  Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. , 1987 .

[32]  P. Chattopadhyay Can Dissimilarity Lead to Positive Outcomes? The Influence of Open versus Closed Minds , 2007 .

[33]  D. Turban,et al.  Supervisor-subordinate similarity: types, effects, and mechanisms. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Separating individual and group effects , 1985 .

[35]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity Among Men and Women , 2004 .

[36]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. , 1992 .

[37]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations , 1995 .

[38]  Nijole V. Benokraitis Subtle Sexism: Current Practice and Prospects for Change , 1997 .

[39]  C. Keating,et al.  The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[41]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee-Organization Linakges: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover , 1985 .

[42]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[43]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  At the Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups , 1998 .

[44]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[45]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[46]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[47]  G. Freytag [CORRELATION AND CAUSALITY]. , 1964, Psychiatrie, Neurologie, und medizinische Psychologie.

[48]  Ellen Ensher,et al.  Effects of Race, Gender, Perceived Similarity, and Contact on Mentor Relationships , 1997 .

[49]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Peer Responses to Low Performers: An Attributional Model of Helping in the Context of Groups , 2001 .

[50]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysis , 1991 .

[51]  Nancy P. Rothbard,et al.  Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles , 2001 .

[52]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. , 1991 .

[53]  P Lieb,et al.  Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  Catherine Kirchmeyer Demographic similarity to the work group: A longitudinal study of managers at the early career stage , 1995 .

[55]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  The More, the Better? A Four-Nation Study of the Inclusion of Women in Symphony Orchestras , 1995 .

[56]  C. M. Riordan,et al.  Demographic diversity and employee attitudes : An empirical examination of relational demography within work units , 1997 .

[57]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[58]  Laura M. Graves,et al.  Demographic Diversity in Decision-Making Groups: The Experiences of Women And People of Color , 1997 .

[59]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[60]  Marianne Tremaine Women and Men in Management , 2003 .

[61]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. , 1999 .

[62]  R. Webber Changes in Perception and Behavior in Mixed Gender Teams , 1987 .

[63]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. , 1986 .

[64]  S. Harkreader,et al.  Multiple Gender Contexts and Employee Rewards , 1993 .

[65]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[66]  W. Wood,et al.  TITLE Sex Differences in Interaction Style as a Product of Perceived Sex Differences in Competence , 2007 .

[67]  Robin J. Ely,et al.  The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. , 1994 .

[68]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[69]  Laura M. Graves,et al.  An investigation of sex discrimination in recruiters' evaluations of actual applicants. , 1988 .

[70]  S. Cross,et al.  Models of the self: self-construals and gender. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[71]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  The Effects of Gender Composition in Academic Departments on Faculty Turnover , 1995 .

[72]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[73]  J. Wagner Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in Groups , 1995 .

[74]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  HOW SIMILARITY TO PEERS AND SUPERVISOR INFLUENCES ORGANIZATIONAL ADVANCEMENT IN DIFFERENT CULTURES , 2002 .

[75]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[76]  N. Cole,et al.  Gender and fair assessment , 1997 .