Acceptability of machine-translated content: A multi-language evaluation by translators and end-users
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Sheila Castilho,et al. Does post-editing increase usability? A study with Brazilian Portuguese as target language , 2014, EAMT.
[2] Lucia Specia,et al. Exploiting Objective Annotations for Minimising Translation Post-editing Effort , 2011, EAMT.
[3] Joanna Drugan,et al. Quality In Professional Translation: Assessment and Improvement , 2013 .
[4] H. Bernard. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1988 .
[5] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .
[6] Ana Guerberof Arenas. Correlations between productivity and quality when post-editing in a professional context , 2014, Machine Translation.
[7] Michael Carl,et al. Post-editing machine translation: A usability test for professional translation settings , 2015 .
[8] H. Isahara,et al. Evaluation method for determining groups of users who find MT “useful” , 2001, MTSUMMIT.
[9] Ilse Depraetere,et al. What counts as useful advice in a university post-editing training context? Report on a case , 2010, EAMT.
[10] R. Beaugrande,et al. Introduction to text linguistics , 1981 .
[11] Sara Stymne,et al. Eye Tracking as a Tool for Machine Translation Error Analysis , 2012, LREC.
[12] Sharon O'Brien,et al. Analysing Post-Editing Performance: Correlations with Years of Translation Experience , 2010, EAMT.
[13] Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al. The impact of machine translation error types on post-editing effort indicators , 2015, MTSUMMIT.
[14] Geoffrey S. Koby,et al. Defining Translation Quality , 2014 .
[15] Sheila Castilho,et al. Content profiling and translation scenarios , 2016 .
[16] Jakob Nielsen,et al. Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.
[17] Sharon O'Brien,et al. Correlations of perceived post-editing effort with measurements of actual effort , 2015, Machine Translation.
[18] Maarit Koponen,et al. Comparing human perceptions of post-editing effort with post-editing operations , 2012, WMT@NAACL-HLT.
[19] D. Cramer,et al. Introduction to Statistics in Psychology , 2005 .
[20] Masaru Tomita,et al. Evaluation of MT Systems by TOEFL , 1993, TMI.
[21] Andrei Popescu-Belis,et al. Principles of Context-Based Machine Translation Evaluation , 2002, Machine Translation.
[22] Jody Byrne,et al. Technical Translation: Usability Strategies for Translating Technical Documentation , 2006 .
[23] Stephen Doherty,et al. Eye tracking as an MT evaluation technique , 2010, Machine Translation.
[24] Lucia Specia,et al. Assessing the Post-Editing Effort for Automatic and Semi-Automatic Translations of DVD Subtitles , 2011, RANLP.
[25] Douglas A. Reynolds,et al. Measuring human readability of machine generated text: three case studies in speech recognition and machine translation , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..
[26] Sharon O'Brien,et al. Assessing the Usability of Raw Machine Translated Output: A User-Centered Study Using Eye Tracking , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[27] François Masselot,et al. A Productivity Test of Statistical Machine Translation Post-Editing in a Typical Localisation Context , 2010, Prague Bull. Math. Linguistics.
[28] A. Burchardt,et al. Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM): A Framework for Declaring and Describing Translation Quality Metrics , 2014 .