There has been much concern expressed during recent times to ensure that information technology (IT) considerations are firmly aligned with business imperatives. For example, two of the top ranked information systems management issues during the 1980s were concerned with the problems incurred in aligning the Information Systems function with that of the organisation as a whole, and in linking information systems and business strategies.
Conversely, recent research and practice has provided us with a vision of IT-induced business process redesign, the opportunity for inter-organisational systems and even the redefinition and refocusing of business products and services.
The reality for many organisations remains that IT investment is seen as a necessary evil at best, with many questioning whether it represents value for money. There have also been somewhat negative reactions to the topic of business process redesign itself: is it old wine in a new bottle? And is it all too risky a business to suggest that radical change rather than incremental change is what is required?
This paper reviews these issues and argues for a refocussing of our attention on (i) information and business systems, and (ii) implementation issues and organisational change, as opposed to the more common practice of concentrating on information technology per se. It takes an organisational, soft operational research perspective on the subject of business reengineering, and provides some outline guidelines for the process of managing the change that is often both necessary and potentially desirable with the introduction and utilisation of new IT. It raises the question whether the lessons from the application of the softer operational research approaches over the past 20 years or so could be used to provide a more informed intervention, given the complexity of the task … and answers that question in the affirmative!
[1]
R. Galliers.
Strategic information systems planning: myths, reality and guidelines for successful implementation
,
1991
.
[2]
J. Rockart.
Chief executives define their own data needs.
,
1979,
Harvard business review.
[3]
Michael Hammer,et al.
Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate
,
1990
.
[4]
Peter Checkland,et al.
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
,
1981
.
[5]
Eric K. Clemons,et al.
Information systems for sustainable competitive advantage
,
1986,
Inf. Manag..
[6]
Shoshana Zuboff,et al.
In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power
,
1989
.
[7]
Bob Galliers,et al.
Information technology: management's boon or bane?
,
1992
.
[8]
B. Gale.
Planning for profit
,
1978
.
[9]
Brian Wilson,et al.
Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications
,
1990
.
[10]
Robert D. Galliers,et al.
Towards a flexible information architecture: integrating business strategies, information systems strategies and business process redesign *
,
1993,
Inf. Syst. J..
[11]
Peter G.W. Keen,et al.
Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology
,
1991
.
[12]
Göran Goldkuhl,et al.
Information Systems Development: A Systematic Approach
,
1981
.
[13]
James A. Senn,et al.
THE MYTHS OF STRATEGIC SYSTEMS: What Defines True Competitive Advantage?
,
1992
.
[14]
Robert D. Galliers,et al.
Information systems planning in the United Kingdom and Australia—a comparison of current practice
,
1988
.
[15]
Peter Checkland,et al.
Soft Systems Methodology in Action
,
1990
.
[16]
Michael J. Earl,et al.
Management Strategies for Information Technology
,
1989
.