Advances in digital imaging during endoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Digital imaging capabilities have recently been incorporated into a number of video systems. Contrast enhancement when using a rigid or semirigid endoscope improves image definition by seeking out existing transitions in detail. Only the areas of transition are accentuated, whereas areas without detail are unaffected. During flexible endoscopy, fiberoptic bundles create a classic honeycomb appearance. The use of "fiberscope" filters minimizes this appearance by expanding the image of each fiberoptic fiber. We therefore assessed whether new developments in digital video image processing have improved image quality for endoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty urologists reviewed a video playback of various endourologic procedures. The type of endoscope was identified, but the urologic surgeon was blinded to the level of enhancement (high or low) or fiberscope filter (A or B) used. Each video clip was scored from 1 to 5 for the following image variables: identification of structure, detail of image, and background noise or interference. All results were averaged and compared using Student's paired t-test. RESULTS During rigid endoscopy, the high and low digital enhancement settings were both superior to no enhancement (P < 0.001), and high enhancement was better than low (P < 0.001). With semirigid endoscopic procedures, high and low digital enhancement were comparable but were superior to no enhancement (P < 0.001). Filters A and B were no better than no enhancement. There was a significant improvement noted with the use of filter A or B during flexible ureteroscopy over no enhancement (P < 0.001). In addition, filter A was better than filter B (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Digital enhancement settings during video endoscopy significantly improve images from rigid and semirigid endoscopes. The digital fiberscope filter significantly improves images obtained during flexible ureteroscopy. Digital image enhancement capabilities should be strongly considered when upgrading video systems. Digital technology must be further studied to improve clinical video imaging during endoscopic surgery.

[1]  S Brown,et al.  Digital imaging in clinical photography, Part 1. , 1994, The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine.

[2]  N Lee,et al.  ABC of Medical Computing: DIGITAL IMAGING , 1995, BMJ.

[3]  M. O'brien,et al.  Digital imaging in anatomic pathology. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  Craine Bl,et al.  Digital imaging colposcopy: basic concepts and applications. , 1993 .

[5]  D S Weinberg Digital imaging as a teaching tool for pathologists. , 1997, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[6]  M I Shafi,et al.  Digital imaging colposcopy, image analysis and quantification of the colposcopic image , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  M. Stiller,et al.  PHOTOGRAPHY WITHOUT FILM: LOW‐COST DIGITAL CAMERAS COME OF AGE IN DERMATOLOGY , 1994, International journal of dermatology.

[8]  M. Marberger,et al.  Ureteroscopy. Development and instrumentation. , 1997, The Urologic clinics of North America.