The Synchronicity Principle Under Quantum Probabilistic Inferences

Free to read on publisher website We propose a new quantum Bayesian Network model in order to compute probabilistic infer¬ences in decision making scenarios. The application of a quantum paradigm to decision making generates interference effects that influence probabilistic inferences. These effects do not exist in a classical setting and constitute a major issue in the decision process, because they generate quantum parameters that highly increase with the amount of uncertainty of the problem. To automatically compute these quantum parameters, we propose a heuristic inspired by Jung’s Synchronicity principle. Synchronicity can be defined by a significant coincidence that appears be¬tween a mental state and an event occurring in the external world. It is the occurrence of meaningful, but not causally connected events. We tested our quantum Bayesian Network together with the Synchronicity inspired heuristic in empirical experiments related to categorization/decision in which the law of total probability was being violated. Results showed that the proposed quantum model was able to simulate the observed empirical findings from the experiments. We then applied our model to a more general scenario and showed the differences between classical and quantum inferences in a Lung Cancer medical diagnosis Bayesian Network.

[1]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum, classical and intermediate: An illustrative example , 1994 .

[2]  Andrei Khrennikov Linear representations of probabilistic transformations induced by context transitions , 2001 .

[3]  Richard Doll,et al.  Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  C. Jung,et al.  The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche , 2022 .

[5]  C. Krumhansl Concerning the Applicability of Geometric Models to Similarity Data : The Interrelationship Between Similarity and Spatial Density , 2005 .

[6]  Shmuel Zamir,et al.  Type Indeterminacy: A Model for the KT(Kahneman-Tversky)-Man , 2006, physics/0604166.

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[8]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence , 2004, Computer science and data analysis series.

[9]  M. Degroot,et al.  Probability and Statistics , 1977 .

[10]  Andrei Khrennikov From classical statistical model to quantum model through ignorance of information , 2005 .

[11]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[12]  Croson,et al.  The Disjunction Effect and Reason-Based Choice in Games. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[13]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .

[14]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Representation of the Kolmogorov model having all distinguishing features of quantum probabilistic model , 2003 .

[15]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Mental States Follow Quantum Mechanics During Perception and Cognition of Ambiguous Figures , 2009, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[16]  Robert F. Bordley Quantum Mechanical and Human Violations of Compound Probability Principles: Toward a Generalized Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle , 1998, Oper. Res..

[17]  Igor V. Limar A Version of Jung’s Synchronicity in the Event of Correlation of Mental Processes in the Past and the Future: Possible Role of Quantum Entanglement in Quantum Vacuum , 2012 .

[18]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement , 2011, ArXiv.

[19]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[20]  Taksu Cheon,et al.  Interference and inequality in quantum decision theory , 2010, 1008.2628.

[21]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[23]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum-like generalization of the Bayesian updating scheme for objective and subjective mental uncertainties , 2012 .

[24]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[25]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[26]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[27]  Charles Lambdin,et al.  The disjunction effect reexamined: Relevant methodological issues and the fallacy of unspecified percentage comparisons , 2007 .

[28]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition , 2011 .

[29]  Robert R. Tucci Quantum Bayesian Nets , 1995, quant-ph/9706039.

[30]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like brain: "Interference of minds". , 2006, Bio Systems.

[31]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: The use of probability interference and other concepts , 2009 .

[32]  Andrei Khrennikov Linear and nonlinear analogues of the schrödinger equation in the contextual approach to quantum mechanics , 2005 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. , 1994 .

[34]  V. I. Danilov,et al.  Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty , 2010 .

[35]  Jennifer Trueblood,et al.  Comparison of Quantum and Bayesian Inference Models , 2009, QI.

[36]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  New Paradoxes of Risky Decision Making , 2022 .

[37]  A. Khrennikov Information Dynamics in Cognitive, Psychological, Social, and Anomalous Phenomena , 2004 .

[38]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum Markov Model for Data from Shafir-Tversky Experiments in Cognitive Psychology , 2009, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[39]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Markov and Quantum models of decision-making , 2009 .

[40]  Josef Perner,et al.  The Disjunction Effect: Does It Exist for Two-Step Gambles? , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[42]  Pierfrancesco La Mura Projective expected utility: a subjective formulation , 2008, TARK '09.

[43]  Evgenia Hristova Disjunction Effect in Prisoners Dilemma : Evidences from an Eye-tracking Study , 2008 .

[44]  Peter Bruza,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision: How to model human information processing using quantum information theory , 2012 .

[45]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Quantum Structure Description of the Liar Paradox , 1999 .

[46]  H.Atmanspacher,et al.  Weak Quantum Theory: Complementarity and Entanglement in Physics and Beyond , 2001, quant-ph/0104109.

[47]  Diederik Aerts Quantum structures: An attempt to explain the origin of their appearance in nature , 1995 .

[48]  Joseph P. Zbilut,et al.  On the Existence of Quantum Wave Function and Quantum Interference Effects in Mental States: An Experimental Confirmation During Perception and Cognition in Humans , 2008 .

[49]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism , 2009 .

[50]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Information Processing Explanation of Disjunction Effects , 2006 .

[51]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[52]  Sven Aerts Interactive Probability Models: Inverse Problems on the Sphere , 1998 .

[53]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[54]  Andrei Khrennivov,et al.  Classical and Quantum Mechanics on Information Spaces with Applications to Cognitive, Psychological, Social, and Anomalous Phenomena , 1999, quant-ph/0003016.

[55]  J. Schreiber Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[56]  John E. Taplin,et al.  Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in Prisoner's Dilemma games. , 2002 .

[57]  Joseph P. Zbilut,et al.  Some remarks on an experiment suggesting quantum-like behavior of cognitive entities and formulation of an abstract quantum mechanical formalism to describe cognitive entity and its dynamics , 2007 .

[58]  J. Sladkowski,et al.  Quantum-like approach to financial risk: quantum anthropic principle , 2001 .

[59]  Jennifer Trueblood,et al.  A Quantum Probability Account of Order Effects in Inference , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[60]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[61]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Question Order Model Supported by Empirical Tests of an A Priori and Precise Prediction , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[62]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty , 1992 .

[63]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Interpretations of Probability , 1999 .

[64]  Mika Hirvensalo Quantum computing, Second Edition , 2004, Natural computing series.

[65]  Andrei Khrennikov Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social and anomalous phenomena , 2000 .

[66]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum-Like Model for Decision Making Process in Two Players Game , 2011 .

[67]  Riccardo Franco,et al.  The conjunction fallacy and interference effects , 2007, 0708.3948.

[68]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Bayesian Models of Inductive Learning , 2006 .

[69]  D. Poulin,et al.  Quantum Graphical Models and Belief Propagation , 2007, 0708.1337.

[70]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[71]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[72]  E. Rieffel,et al.  Quantum Computing: A Gentle Introduction , 2011 .