Oral Dryness Examinations : Use of an Oral Moisture Checking Device and a Modified Cotton Method

Purpose: This study compared oral dryness measured using an oral moisture checking device and the modified cotton method. Methods: Oral moisture was measured at the lingual mucosa (LM) and the buccal mucosa (BM) using an oral moisture checking device in 13 healthy adults (HA) and 13 patients with oral dryness (OD). The modified cotton method was performed in the same subjects by placing cottons under and over the tongue for 30 seconds and measuring the weight of the saliva absorbed by the cotton. Differences between groups were examined using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: The moisture percentage at the LM in the HA and OD groups was 30.0 ± 0.5 % and 28.6 ± 1.1 %, respectively, while the percentage at the BM was 30.3 ± 0.2 % and 29.6 ± 0.7 %, respectively. The amount of hypoglossal salivary secretion in the HA and OD groups was 0.339 ± 0.172 g and 0.036 ± 0.033 g, respectively, while the amount of salivary secretion on the tongue’ s surface was 0.059 ± 0.023 g and 0.011 ± 0.007 g, respectively. Both oral moisture and the amount of saliva at rest were significantly different between the HA and OD groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both the oral moisture checking device and the modified cotton method were useful for measuring oral dryness. An oral moisture level of 30 % or less, less than 0.1 g of saliva collected at the hypoglossus within 30 seconds, or less than 0.02 g of saliva collected from the surface of the tongue within 30 seconds may indicate oral dryness.

[1]  L. Sreebny,et al.  Xerostomia. Part I: Relationship to other oral symptoms and salivary gland hypofunction. , 1988, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[2]  J D Walter,et al.  New design for an artificial saliva reservoir for the mandibular complete denture. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  P. Kohler,et al.  A quantitative test for xerostomia. The Saxon test, an oral equivalent of the Schirmer test. , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  B. Sonies,et al.  Xerostomia: evaluation of a symptom with increasing significance. , 1985, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[5]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  A simple technique for the determination of salivary gland hypofunction. , 2002, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  I. Mandel The role of saliva in maintaining oral homeostasis. , 1989, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  Fumi Takahashi,et al.  [The usefulness of an oral moisture checking device (Moisture Checker for Mucus)]. , 2005, Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai zasshi.

[8]  W. Niedermeier,et al.  Salivary secretion and denture retention. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  Linda Lee,et al.  Using the modified Schirmer test to measure mouth dryness: a preliminary study. , 2005, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  T. Axéll,et al.  Oral mucosal friction and subjective perception of dry mouth in relation to salivary secretion. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[11]  史 高橋,et al.  口腔水分計 (モイスチャーチェッカー・ムーカスR) の有用性 , 2005 .

[12]  L. Sreebny,et al.  Xerostomia. A neglected symptom. , 1987, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  A. Diaz-Arnold,et al.  The impact of saliva on patient care: A literature review. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  A. Bermejo-Fenoll,et al.  Is there an age-dependent decrease in resting secretion of saliva of healthy persons? A study of 1493 subjects. , 1994, Brazilian dental journal.

[15]  L. Tabak,et al.  Saliva: a significant factor in removable prosthodontic treatment. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.