Relationships of the competitor, stress tolerator, ruderal functional strategies of grass species with lifespan, photosynthetic type, naturalization and climate

Abstract Grass species (family Poaceae) are globally distributed, adapted to a wide range of climates and express a diversity of functional strategies. We explored the functional strategies of grass species using the competitor, stress tolerator, ruderal (CSR) system and asked how a species’ strategy relates to its functional traits, climatic distribution and propensity to become naturalized outside its native range. We used a global set of trait data for grass species to classify functional strategies according to the CSR system based on leaf traits. Differences in strategies in relation to lifespan (annual or perennial), photosynthetic type (C3 or C4), or naturalisation (native or introduced) were investigated. In addition, correlations with traits not included in the CSR classification were analyzed, and a model was fitted to predict a species’ average mean annual temperature and annual precipitation across its range as a function of CSR scores. Values for competitiveness were higher in C4 species than in C3 species, values for stress tolerance were higher in perennials than in annuals, and introduced species had more pronounced competitive-ruderal strategies than native species. Relationships between the CSR classification, based on leaf traits, and other functional traits were analyzed. Competitiveness was positively correlated with height, while ruderality was correlated with specific root length, indicating that both above- and belowground traits underlying leaf and root economics contribute to realized CSR strategies. Further, relationships between climate and CSR classification showed that species with competitive strategies were more common in warm climates and at high precipitation, whereas species with stress tolerance strategies were more common in cold climates and at low precipitation. The findings presented here demonstrate that CSR classification of functional strategies based on leaf traits matches expectations for the adaptations of grass species that underlie lifespan, photosynthetic type, naturalization and climate.

[1]  P. Shi,et al.  Variation of plant CSR strategies across a precipitation gradient in the alpine grasslands on the northern Tibet Plateau. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  T. Kuyper,et al.  An integrated framework of plant form and function: The belowground perspective. , 2021, The New phytologist.

[3]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Predicting intraspecific trait variation among California's grasses , 2021, Journal of Ecology.

[4]  T. Ruttink,et al.  To grow or survive: Which are the strategies of a perennial grass to face severe seasonal stress? , 2021 .

[5]  J. Preston,et al.  To Coldly Go Where No Grass has Gone Before: A Multidisciplinary Review of Cold Adaptation in Poaceae , 2020 .

[6]  S. Jansen,et al.  The acquisitive-conservative axis of leaf trait variation emerges even in homogeneous environments. , 2020, Annals of botany.

[7]  R. Govaerts,et al.  Historical legacies and ecological determinants of grass naturalizations worldwide , 2020, Ecography.

[8]  B. Trevaskis,et al.  Increased above ground resource allocation is a likely precursor for independent evolutionary origins of annuality in the Pooideae grass subfamily. , 2020, The New phytologist.

[9]  E. Borer,et al.  Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability , 2020, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[10]  A. Wingler,et al.  Functional Strategies and Life Histories of Grasses Underlying Yield and Resilience , 2020 .

[11]  C. Osborne,et al.  The global distribution of grass functional traits within grassy biomes , 2020, Journal of Biogeography.

[12]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Identification of suites of traits that explains drought resistance and phenological patterns of plants in a semi-arid grassland community , 2020, Oecologia.

[13]  B. Sandel,et al.  Intraspecific trait variation, functional turnover and trait differences among native and exotic grasses along a precipitation gradient , 2019, Journal of Vegetation Science.

[14]  Samuel H. Taylor,et al.  Life history is a key factor explaining functional trait diversity among subtropical grasses, and its influence differs between C3 and C4 species , 2019, Journal of experimental botany.

[15]  Erol Akçay,et al.  C4 photosynthesis and climate through the lens of optimality , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  D. Richardson,et al.  Tall-statured grasses: a useful functional group for invasion science , 2018, Biological Invasions.

[17]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world‐wide , 2017 .

[18]  R. Standish,et al.  Global resource acquisition patterns of invasive and native plant species do not hold at the regional scale in Mediterranean type ecosystems , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[19]  Z. Botta‐Dukát,et al.  Multidimensional structure of grass functional traits among species and assemblages , 2016 .

[20]  D. Richardson,et al.  Much more give than take: South Africa as a major donor but infrequent recipient of invasive non‐native grasses , 2016 .

[21]  M. Christenhusz,et al.  The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase , 2016 .

[22]  A. Stokes,et al.  Root structure-function relationships in 74 species: evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[23]  S. Wright,et al.  The global spectrum of plant form and function , 2015, Nature.

[24]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  Biogeographically distinct controls on C3 and C4 grass distributions: merging community and physiological ecology , 2015 .

[25]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[26]  Guido Brusa,et al.  Allocating CSR plant functional types: the use of leaf economics and size traits to classify woody and herbaceous vascular plants , 2013 .

[27]  R. Sage,et al.  Photorespiration and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. , 2012, Annual review of plant biology.

[28]  T. Hodkinson,et al.  New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[29]  F. Woodward,et al.  Photosynthetic pathway and ecological adaptation explain stomatal trait diversity amongst grasses. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[30]  Alejandro Ordonez Gloriaac,et al.  3 Functional differences between native and alien species: a global–scale comparison , 2011 .

[31]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Phylogenetic analyses reveal the shady history of C4 grasses , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[33]  B. Cerabolini,et al.  The leaf economics spectrum of Poaceae reflects variation in survival strategies , 2007 .

[34]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[35]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[36]  R. Govaerts.  World Checklist for Selected Plant Families , 2004 .

[37]  R. Sage.  The evolution of C 4 photosynthesis , 2003 .

[38]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[39]  E. Garnier,et al.  Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1994 .

[40]  E. Garnier.  Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1992 .

[41]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.