First robotic tracheal intubations in humans using the Kepler intubation system.

BACKGROUND Intubation is one of the most important anaesthetic skills. We developed a robotic intubation system (Kepler intubation system, KIS) for oral tracheal intubation. METHODS In this pilot study, 12 patients were enrolled after approval of the local Ethics board and written informed consent. The KIS consists of four main components: a ThrustMaster T.Flight Hotas X joystick (Guillemot Inc., New York, NY, USA), a JACO robotic arm (Kinova Rehab, Montreal, QC, Canada), a Pentax AWS video laryngoscope (Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark), and a software control system. The joystick allows simulation of the wrist or arm movements of a human operator. The success rate of intubation and intubation times were measured. RESULTS Eleven men and one woman aged 66 yr were included in this study. Intubation was successful in all but one patient using KIS at a total time of [median (inter-quartile range; range)] 93 (87, 109; 76, 153) s; in one patient, fogging of the video laryngoscope prevented intubation using KIS. CONCLUSIONS We present the first human testing of a robotic intubation system for oral tracheal intubation. The success rate was high at 91%. Future studies are needed to assess the performance and safety of such a system.

[1]  C. Kam,et al.  A Study of Orotracheal Intubation in Emergency Departments of Five District Hospitals in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[2]  D. Kopacz,et al.  The Regional Anesthesia “Learning Curve”: What Is the Minimum Number of Epidural and Spinal Blocks to Reach Consistency? , 1995, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[3]  J. Henderson,et al.  The Pentax‐AWS® rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases * , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[4]  A. Sia,et al.  Randomised comparison of Pentax AirwayScope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[5]  Thomas M. Hemmerling,et al.  The Kepler Intubation System , 2012, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  A. Sia,et al.  Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C‐MAC™, Glidescope® vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation * , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[7]  K. Shingu,et al.  The Pentax-AWS Video-Laryngoscope: The First Experience in One Hundred Patients , 2008, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  Steven A. Julious,et al.  Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study , 2005 .

[9]  Christoph Konrad,et al.  Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures? , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  J. Laffey,et al.  Comparison of the Glidescope® and Pentax AWS® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation , 2009, BMC emergency medicine.

[11]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. , 2002, Urology.

[12]  Getúlio Rodrigues de Oliveira Filho,et al.  The Construction of Learning Curves for Basic Skills in Anesthetic Procedures: An Application for the Cumulative Sum Method , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  Get lio Rodrigues de Oliveira Filho,et al.  The construction of learning curves for basic skills in anesthetic procedures: an application for the cumulative sum method. , 2002 .

[14]  W. Loder.  Airway management in the obese patient. , 2010, Critical care clinics.

[15]  B. Harte,et al.  Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscope , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[16]  A G Butchart,et al.  The learning curve for videolaryngoscopy , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[17]  P. Tighe,et al.  Robot-Assisted Airway Support: A Simulated Case , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.