Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.

Consensus methods are being used increasingly to solve problems in medicine and health. Their main purpose is to define levels of agreement on controversial subjects. Advocates suggest that, when properly employed, consensus strategies can create structured environments in which experts are given the best available information, allowing their solutions to problems to be more justifiable and credible than otherwise. This paper surveys the characteristics of several major methods (Delphi, Nominal Group, and models developed by the National Institutes of Health and Glaser) and provides guidelines for those who want to use the techniques. Among the concerns these guidelines address are selecting problems, choosing members for consensus panels, specifying acceptable levels of agreement, properly using empirical data, obtaining professional and political support, and disseminating results.

[1]  André L. Delbecq,et al.  A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning , 1971 .

[2]  A. Delbecq,et al.  The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. , 1972, American journal of public health.

[3]  A V Milholland,et al.  Medical assessment by a Delphi group opinion technic. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  F. Goodale,et al.  The future of pathology: a Delphi study by pathology department chairmen. , 1976, Journal of medical education.

[5]  S. Horn,et al.  Statistical Methods for Reliability and Validity Testing: An Application to Nominal Group Judgments in Health Care , 1977, Medical care.

[6]  I Moscovice,et al.  Health services research for decision-makers: the use of the Delphi technique to determine health priorities. , 1977, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[7]  J. W. Williamson Formulating priorities for quality assurance activity. Description of a method and its application. , 1978, JAMA.

[8]  L. F. Moore,et al.  Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department. , 1979, Journal of medical education.

[9]  E. Glaser,et al.  Using Behavioral Science Strategies for Defining the State-of-the-Art , 1980 .

[10]  J. Charlton,et al.  Spending priorities in Kent: a Delphi study. , 1981, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[11]  R B Hill,et al.  The Delphi predictions of pathology chairmen: a six-year retrospective view. , 1981, Journal of medical education.

[12]  V. Trivedi Measurement of Task Delegations Among Nurses by Nominal Group Process Analysis , 1982, Medical care.

[13]  Matthew J. Friedman,et al.  The Relative Importance of Treatment Outcomes , 1982 .