Induction of a Highly Specific Antiviral State in Transgenic Plants: Implications for Regulation of Gene Expression and Virus Resistance.

Transgenic tobacco plants expressing either a full-length form of the tobacco etch virus (TEV) coat protein or a form truncated at the N terminus of the TEV coat protein were initially susceptible to TEV infection, and typical systemic symptoms developed. However, 3 to 5 weeks after a TEV infection was established, transgenic plants "recovered" from the TEV infection, and new stem and leaf tissue emerged symptom and virus free. A TEV-resistant state was induced in the recovered tissue. The resistance was virus specific. Recovered plant tissue could not be infected with TEV, but was susceptible to the closely related virus, potato virus Y. The resistance phenotype was functional at the single-cell level because protoplasts from recovered transgenic tissue did not support TEV replication. Surprisingly, steady state transgene mRNA levels in recovered tissue were 12-to 22-fold less than transgene mRNA levels in uninoculated transgenic tissue of the same developmental stage. However, nuclear run-off studies suggested that transgene transcription rates in recovered and uninoculated plants were similar. We propose that the resistant state and reduced steady state levels of transgene transcript accumulation are mediated at the cellular level by a cytoplasmic activity that targets specific RNA sequences for inactivation.

[1]  D. Gonsalves,et al.  Protection Against Detrimental Effects of Potyvirus Infection in Transgenic Tobacco Plants Expressing the Papaya Ringspot Virus Coat Protein Gene , 1991, Bio/Technology.

[2]  K. Cox.  Analysis of plant gene expression , 1988 .

[3]  J. Kuc.  Induced Immunity to Plant Disease , 1982 .

[4]  D. Inzé,et al.  Suppression of beta‐1,3‐glucanase transgene expression in homozygous plants. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[5]  D. Gonsalves,et al.  Different Mechanisms Protect Transgenic Tobacco Against Tomato Spotted Wilt and Impatiens Necrotic Spot Tospoviruses , 1993, Bio/Technology.

[6]  R. Rhoads,et al.  Synthesis of potyviral RNA and proteins in tobacco mesophyll protoplasts inoculated by electroporation , 1987 .

[7]  A. van Kammen,et al.  The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of cowpea is not involved in cowpea mosaic virus RNA replication: immunological evidence. , 1984, Virology.

[8]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Pathogen-derived resistance to a potyvirus: immune and resistant phenotypes in transgenic tobacco expressing altered forms of a potyvirus coat protein nucleotide sequence. , 1992, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[9]  B. J. Benenfeld,et al.  Interference between coinoculated viroids. , 1988, Virology.

[10]  R. Fulton.  Practices and Precautions in the Use of Cross Protection for Plant Virus Disease Control , 1986 .

[11]  J. A. Ryals,et al.  Coordinate Gene Activity in Response to Agents That Induce Systemic Acquired Resistance. , 1991, The Plant cell.

[12]  T. Wilson.  Strategies to protect crop plants against viruses: pathogen-derived resistance blossoms. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. Goldbach,et al.  Genome similarities between plant and animal RNA viruses. , 1987, Microbiological sciences.

[14]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Pathogen derived resistance to potyviruses: working, but why? , 1993 .

[15]  R. Beachy,et al.  Coat Protein-Mediated Resistance Against Virus Infection , 1990 .

[16]  T. Hall,et al.  Minus sense transcripts of brome mosaic virus RNA-3 intercistronic region interfere with viral replication. , 1993, Virology.

[17]  C. Napoli,et al.  Introduction of a Chimeric Chalcone Synthase Gene into Petunia Results in Reversible Co-Suppression of Homologous Genes in trans. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[18]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[19]  R. W. Jones,et al.  Defective-interfering RNAs and elevated temperatures inhibit replication of tomato bushy stunt virus in inoculated protoplasts. , 1990, Virology.

[20]  C. H. T. Cate,et al.  Differential methylation and expression of the β-glucuronidase and neomycin phosphotransferase genes in transgenic plants of potato cv. Bintje , 1993 .

[21]  R. Grumet,et al.  Genetic engineering of potyvirus resistance using constructs derived from the zucchini yellow mosaic virus coat protein gene. , 1993, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[22]  H. L. Sänger,et al.  RNA-directed RNA polymerase from tomato leaves. I. Purification and physical properties. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  M. Primig,et al.  Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[24]  R. Goldbach,et al.  Characterization of RNA–Mediated Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Transgenic Tobacco Plants , 1992, Bio/Technology.

[25]  K. Fernow,et al.  Cross protection among four viroids. , 1978, Virology.

[26]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Untranslatable transcripts of the tobacco etch virus coat protein gene sequence can interfere with tobacco etch virus replication in transgenic plants and protoplasts. , 1992, Virology.

[27]  J. Sanford,et al.  The concept of parasite-derived resistance—Deriving resistance genes from the parasite's own genome , 1985 .

[28]  J. Riechmann,et al.  Highlights and prospects of potyvirus molecular biology. , 1992, The Journal of general virology.

[29]  J. Mol,et al.  Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[30]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Translation of potyvirus RNA in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate: reaction conditions and identification of capsid protein as one of the products of in vitro translation of tobacco etch and pepper mottle viral RNAs. , 1980, Virology.