Topological analysis for 3D real, symmetric second-order tensor fields using Deviatoric Eigenvalue Wheel

Tensor fields are of particular interest not solely because they represent a wide variety of physical phenomena but also because crucial importance can be inferred from vector and scalar fields in terms of the gradient and Hessian, respectively. This work presents our key insights into the topological structure of 3D real, symmetric second-order tensor fields, of which the central goal is to show a novel computation model we call Deviatoric Eigenvalue Wheel. Based on the computation model, we show how the eigenanalysis for tensor fields can be simplified and put forward a new categorizer for topological lines. Both findings outperform existing approaches as our computation depends on the tensor entries only. We finally make a strict mathematical proof and draw a conclusion of R = K cos ( 3 α ) , wherein R is the tensor invariant of determinant, K is a tensor constant, and α is called Nickalls angle. This conclusion allows users to better understand how the feature lines are formed and how the space is divided by topological structures. We test the effectiveness of our findings with real and analytic tensor fields as well as simulation vector fields. Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted HighlightsWe propose the new computational model called Deviatoric Eigenvalue Wheel.The computation of the presented eigen analysis relies on the tensor entries only.The new categorizer depends on the sign of the determinant of tensor values.The tensor invariant of determinant is a function over the Nickalls angle.

[1]  Jay D. Humphrey,et al.  An invariant basis for natural strain which yields orthogonal stress response terms in isotropic hyperelasticity , 2000 .

[2]  Rüdiger Westermann,et al.  Stress Tensor Field Visualization for Implant Planning in Orthopedics , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Ketan Mehta,et al.  Superellipsoid-based, Real Symmetric Traceless Tensor Glyphs Motivated by Nematic Liquid Crystal Alignment Visualization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  Xiaoqiang Zheng,et al.  Topological structures of 3D tensor fields , 2005 .

[5]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Topological lines in 3D tensor fields and discriminant Hessian factorization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  R. Nickalls A new approach to solving the cubic: Cardan’s solution revealed , 1993, The Mathematical Gazette.

[7]  Lambertus Hesselink,et al.  Visualization of second order tensor fields and matrix data , 1992, Proceedings Visualization '92.

[8]  G. Kindlmann,et al.  Orthogonal tensor invariants and the analysis of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Invariant Crease Lines for Topological and Structural Analysis of Tensor Fields , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[10]  G. Kindlmann,et al.  Superquadric Glyphs for Symmetric Second-Order Tensors , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Charles D. Hansen,et al.  Visualization of intricate flow structures for vortex breakdown analysis , 2004, IEEE Visualization 2004.

[12]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  2D asymmetric tensor analysis , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[13]  Charles R. Doering,et al.  Dynamically stretched vortices as solutions of the 3D Navier—Stokes equations , 1999 .

[14]  Gerik Scheuermann,et al.  HOT-lines: tracking lines in higher order tensor fields , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[15]  Eugene Zhang,et al.  Interactive Visualization of Rotational Symmetry Fields on Surfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Emmanuel Dormy,et al.  Revisiting the ABC flow dynamo , 2012, 1206.5186.

[17]  Gordon L. Kindlmann,et al.  Tensorlines: advection-diffusion based propagation through diffusion tensor fields , 1999, Proceedings Visualization '99 (Cat. No.99CB37067).

[18]  Lambertus Hesselink,et al.  The topology of symmetric, second-order tensor fields , 1994, VIS '94.

[19]  Robert S. Laramee,et al.  The State of the Art , 2015 .

[20]  S. B. F. Dorch On the Structure of the Magnetic Field in a Kinematic ABC Flow Dynamo , 2000 .

[21]  Robert S. Laramee,et al.  Asymmetric Tensor Field Visualization for Surfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[22]  Lambertus Hesselink,et al.  Visualizing second-order tensor fields with hyperstreamlines , 1993, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[23]  Robert S. Laramee,et al.  Robust extraction and analysis towards complete 3D tensor field topology , 2013 .

[24]  S. Strogatz Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering , 1995 .

[25]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Topological Visualization of Brain Diffusion MRI Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  Xavier Tricoche,et al.  Degenerate 3D Tensors , 2006, Visualization and Processing of Tensor Fields.

[27]  Xavier Cufí,et al.  Yet Another Survey on Image Segmentation: Region and Boundary Information Integration , 2002, ECCV.

[28]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Topological lines in 3D tensor fields , 2004, IEEE Visualization 2004.

[29]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[30]  Robert S. Laramee,et al.  Asymmetric Tensor Analysis for Flow Visualization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[31]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.